Search Results for "Section 50"

113 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 113 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"High Court Upholds Conviction in Heinous Gang Rape Case: Admissibility of Electronic Evidence Challenged" "Bombay High Court affirms the life imprisonment of two accused, focusing on electronic evidence and delay in the victim’s report."

1. Introduction and Case Background: Facts: The appellants were convicted for gang rape under Sections 376(2)(g), 366A, 292, 500, and 506 (II) of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Petition Seeking Quashing of FIR in Dowry Death Case Dismissed. Court holds that allegations of cruelty, dowry harassment, and suicide justify full investigation and trial

The Bombay High Court dismissed a petition filed by the husband and in-laws of the deceased, Ms. Harshal, seeking the quashing of an FIR under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Conviction Upheld for LSD Possession in Goa NDPS Case" "Bombay High Court dismisses appeal, reinforcing compliance with NDPS Act's procedural safeguards."

The Bombay High Court, dismissed an appeal filed by Appellant, upholding his conviction under Section 22(c) of the NDPS Act. The appellant had been co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Dowry Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. The Court ruled that the allegations were vague, general, and appeared to be motivated by an underlying property dispute.

The Supreme Court quashed an FIR filed under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 IPC, citing lack of specific allegations and evidence. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Acquiring Body Barred from Seeking Reference under Section 28-A(3) of the Land Acquisition Act. The Bombay High Court ruled that acquiring bodies cannot seek references under Section 28-A(3), as the legislative intent was to benefit landowners, not the acquiring bodies.

  Background of Acquisition (Paras 1-2) Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation Limited was the acquiring body for the Bori Medium...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Abhishek Banerjee & Rujira Banerjee's Plea Against ED Summons. Money laundering case involving coal theft proceeds worth ₹168 crores; summons upheld, ED’s territorial jurisdiction recognized.

The Supreme Court of India upheld the summons issued by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) under Section 50 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Bombay High Court Declares Detention of Hem Prabhakar Shah Illegal" Court Orders Immediate Release Due to Violation of Constitutional and Procedural Rights

The Bombay High Court ruled that the detention of Hem Prabhakar Shah, who was apprehended based on a Look Out Circular (LOC), was illegal due to viola...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"High Court Upholds 20-Year Sentence in Sexual Assault Case Under POCSO Act". "Appellant's appeal dismissed; Court affirms evidence of victim's age, medical testimony, and credibility of prosecution's case."

The Court based its decision on the sufficiency of the victim’s age-related evidence, consistent testimonies, corroborative medical findings, and th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"High Court Upholds Investigation in Multi-Crore Seva Bank Loan Fraud and Money Laundering Case" "A comprehensive examination of loan misappropriation and money laundering under PMLA provisions."

The Bombay High Court considered multiple writ petitions filed by Amar S. Mulchandani and other petitioners, challenging the validity of investigation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Defamation Case Ruling: Allegations of Outraging Modesty and IT Act Violation Confirmed, Criminal Intimidation Charges Dismissed. Court validates charges under IPC Section 509 and IT Act Section 67 for derogatory email content; dismisses criminal intimidation claims.

The case revolves around derogatory emails sent by the petitioner, containing gender-based remarks aimed at insulting the respondent. The court found ...