Search Results for "Reserved category"

88 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 88 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Reserved Category Candidate Who Availed Age Relaxation: Cannot Claim General Category Seat. Age Relaxation Under Gujarat Policy Is a Relaxation in Standard, Not a Mere Concession, and Candidates Availing It Must Be Adjusted Against Reserved Posts.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Niravkumar Dilipbhai Makwana against the Gujarat Public Service Commission and others, upholding the D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Service Law Case — Monetary Benefits Granted from Date of First Appointment. Delay in Filing Writ Petition Not Attributable to Employee; Benefits Cannot Be Restricted to Three Years Prior to Filing.

The appellant, Giridhar, was appointed as a Lecturer in a college on 26.12.1989 against a post reserved for the scheduled tribe category, despite not ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Seniority Dispute Over Catch-Up Rule for Reserved Category Promotions. Consequential Seniority for Scheduled Caste Promotee Upheld as Regular Promotion Not Fortuitous.

The case involves a seniority dispute between two officers of the Government of Maharashtra: Sudhakar Baburao Nangnure (appellant, open category) and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against Kerala High Court Judgment Upholding CAT Order for Inclusion in Promotion Panel. Delay and Laches Not a Bar as Representation Was Replied and Tribunal Condoned Delay.

The case involves a dispute over promotion to the post of Assistant Personnel Officer (APO) in the Southern Railway under the 30% Limited Departmental...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Admissions to BHMS Course Without NEET Percentile Requirement for 2018-19 Academic Year. The court permitted admissions based on the original eligibility criteria in the information brochure, due to lack of uniformity across states and pending academic session.

The case pertains to the challenge by the Association of Managements of Homeopathic Medical Colleges of Maharashtra against the introduction of a mini...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Age Limit and Recruitment Interval Rules for Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service. Rules 8(1) and 12 of UPHJS Rules, 1975 Held Valid as Not Manifestly Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 16.

The Supreme Court considered the constitutional validity of Rules 8(1) and 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975. The petitioner...