Search Results for "Rigorous Imprisonment"

257 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 257 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Acquits Appellant: No Evidence to Sustain Conviction Under Section 498-A IPC" "Appellant acquitted after conviction found based on over implication and lack of specific evidence"

An appeal against the conviction under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sentencing by the Bombay High Court. The appellant was convict...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Commutes Death Sentence in Gruesome Honor Killing Case. Appellant's death penalty reduced to 20 years of rigorous imprisonment without remission in a case involving the murder of his pregnant daughter.

The Supreme Court reviewed the death sentence awarded to the appellant, who was convicted of murdering his pregnant daughter in an apparent honor kill...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused Due to Lack of Convincing Evidence in Assault on Municipal Officer. In a case marred by contradictions and inconsistencies, the High Court overturns lower court decisions convicting Azharali Jaferali Qureshi for obstructing a public servant.

The Bombay High Court, acquitted (Applicant), who was convicted under Section 332 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for preventing munic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Reduces Applicant's Sentence in Rash Driving Case; Exonerated of Stalking Charges. Accused receives 36-day imprisonment for rash and negligent driving but cleared of stalking charges under IPC Section 354D.

The Bombay High Court revised the sentencing in a criminal revision application. Applicant was initially convicted for offenses under Sections 279, 35...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Conviction Upheld for LSD Possession in Goa NDPS Case" "Bombay High Court dismisses appeal, reinforcing compliance with NDPS Act's procedural safeguards."

The Bombay High Court, dismissed an appeal filed by Appellant, upholding his conviction under Section 22(c) of the NDPS Act. The appellant had been co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court upholds 20-year rigorous imprisonment for appellant convicted under Section 376-AB of IPC and the POCSO Act, 2012, in a case involving an 8-year-old victim.

The Bombay High Court dismissed the appeal of Gajanan More, who was convicted under Section 376-AB of the IPC and Sections 4, 6, and 8 of the POCSO Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appellate Court Orders Retrial in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Fair Trial. The High Court orders retrial as the accused was deprived of legal assistance, compromising his right to a fair trial under Article 21.

This case, revolves around allegations of corruption. The appellant, Devidas Joshi, a Sectional Engineer in the Minor Irrigation Department, was convi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Man Convicted Under POCSO Act Due to Insufficient Evidence. Bombay High Court overturns the conviction of Anil Chhotelal Chhevle, citing lack of concrete evidence and improper identification in a case under POCSO Act and IPC.

The Bombay High Court's Nagpur Bench acquitted the appellant, Anil Chhotelal Chhevle, previously convicted under Section 5(m) and 6 of the POCSO Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Acquittal Based on Inconsistent Testimonies, Lack of Medical Corroboration, and Unsubstantiated Identification.

The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, acquitted Rahul Rajabhau Pistulkar and Aditya @ Shubham Yevale, convicted under Sections 3(b), 4(2), 5(m), and 6 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Acquittal in Child Sexual Offense Case Due to Lack of Corroborative Evidence. Court finds prosecution evidence insufficient, acquitting the accused in a POCSO case.

The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, acquitted Appellant in a case under Section 376(2)(i) of the IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act. The appellant wa...