Bombay High Court Held That Retirement Includes Resignation—Entitlement to Pension Upheld
13 Mar 2025Resignation of a High Court Judge Does Not Forfeit Pensionary Benefits—Interpretation of “Retirement” Under High Court Judges (Salaries and Cond...
Search Results for "Article 217"
8 result(s) found
Found 8 result(s)
Supreme Court
Reservation Lapse Under MRTP Act: Supreme Court Declares Land Free After 33 Years of Inaction. Supreme Court Invokes Article 142 to Do Complete Justice in Land Reservation Case
25 Feb 2025The Supreme Court held that the reservation of the land had lapsed under both Section 49(7) and Section 127 of the MRTP Act due to the failure of the ...
- 1000
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Employee's Appeal in Resignation Withdrawal Case Under Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994. Withdrawal of Prospective Resignation Barred by Implied Contract and Estoppel as Correspondence Showed Mutual Agreement Making Resignation Final and Binding.
20 Feb 2024The appeal arose from a dispute over the withdrawal of a prospective resignation submitted by an employee before its effective date. The appellant, an...
- 19
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Union and State in Consumer Protection Rules Challenge, Reversing High Court's Striking Down of Qualification and Procedure Provisions. Rules 3(2)(b), 4(2)(c), and 6(9) of Consumer Protection (Qualification for appointment, method of recruitment, procedure of appointment, term of office, resignation and removal of President and Members of State Commission and District Commission) Rules, 2020 Found Not Arbitrary Under Article 14 of Constitution of India, as They Provide Sufficient Guidelines for Appointments to Consumer Commissions.
3 Mar 2023The Supreme Court addressed appeals by the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Union of India, and State of Maharashtra against a common judgment and order ...
- 18
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Petition by Judicial Officers in Constitutional Writ Seeking Elevation to High Court Bench. Ad-hoc Service as Fast Track Court Judges Does Not Qualify as Judicial Service Under Article 217(2)(a) of Constitution for Elevation Purposes, Following Precedent in Kum C. Yamini Case.
23 Feb 2023The petitioners, members of the Andhra Pradesh State Judicial Service, approached the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking relie...
- 18
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Collegium Recommendations in High Court Judge Appointments Under Article 217 of the Constitution of India. Judicial Review is Limited to Eligibility and Lack of Effective Consultation, Excluding Suitability Aspects from Justiciability as Per Established Precedents.
10 Feb 2023The judgment addressed writ petitions concerning the scope of judicial review in appointments of High Court judges under Article 217 of the Constituti...
- 13
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes Notification Restricting OCI Cardholders' Admission Rights in Medical Education Under Citizenship Act. Court Held That Impugned Notification Violated Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution as It Discriminated Against OCI Cardholders Without Reasonable Classification, Given Their Long Residence in India and Vacant Seats Data.
3 Feb 2023The dispute involved Overseas Citizens of India (OCI) cardholders, who are students aspiring to pursue MBBS and higher medical courses through NEET se...
- 33
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Activates Dormant Constitutional Provision for Appointment of Ad Hoc Judges to Address High Court Backlog. The Court held that Article 224A of the Constitution of India can be utilized to appoint retired High Court judges as ad hoc judges to tackle over 57 lakh pending cases and 40% vacancies, emphasizing dynamic interpretation and consent requirements.
20 Apr 2021The Supreme Court of India, in a public interest litigation filed by Lok Prahari, addressed the critical issue of backlog in High Courts, with over 57...
