Search Results for "Article 226(2)"

Trending :

Search Results for "Article 226(2)"

6 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Issues Writ of Mandamus to Direct Registration Authorities to Implement Bombay High Court's Order Declaring Insolvent's Transactions Void. Registration Authorities Under Registration Act, 1908 Bound to Give Effect to Binding Judicial Orders Under Article 226(2) of Constitution of India, Despite Territorial Differences, as Inaction Amounts to Wilful Disobedience.

27 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, a secured creditor of Electrex (India) Limited, against the State of Karn...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Asserts Jurisdiction in Writ Petition Against Income Tax Demands Post-Transfer of Jurisdiction. Court Holds That Cause of Action Arose in Part Within Its Territory Due to Amalgamation and Transfer Under Section 127 of Income Tax Act, 1961, Directing Production of Underlying Orders and Staying Recovery.

24 Mar 2026

The dispute involved a writ petition filed by Petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging outstanding income tax demands to...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Rules on Jurisdiction in Excise Duty Rebate Claims Bombay High Court establishes jurisdiction for writ petitions filed by companies challenging the rejection of excise duty rebates. Court confirms maintainability of writ petitions in cases involving orders from Revisionary Authorities located within Mumbai.

4 Sep 2024

The Bombay High Court ruled on the issue of territorial jurisdiction regarding excise duty rebate claims. The court held that the writ petitions were ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appellant's Appeal Against High Court's Jurisdiction Finding in GST Notification Challenge. High Court of Sikkim Lacked Territorial Jurisdiction as Cause of Action for Challenging Goa's GST Notification Arose in Goa, Not Sikkim, Under Article 226(2) of the Constitution.

14 Mar 2023

The dispute originated from writ petitions filed before the High Court of Sikkim by a private limited company engaged in the lottery ticket business, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal in Administrative Tribunal Transfer Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction in High Court. The High Court of Uttarakhand Erred in Entertaining Writ Petition as No Cause of Action Arose Within Its Territory Under Article 226 of Constitution, and Transfer Order Under Section 25 of Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 Was Valid.

3 Mar 2023

The dispute originated from an Original Application filed by a writ petitioner before the Nainital Circuit Bench of the Central Administrative Tribuna...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Administrative Tribunals Act Case on Jurisdictional Grounds - High Court at Calcutta Found Lacking Jurisdiction to Review Transfer Order Passed by Principal Bench at New Delhi. Judicial Review of Tribunal Transfer Orders Under Article 226/227 Lies with High Court Within Whose Territorial Jurisdiction the Tribunal Bench Passing the Order is Located, Not Where Original Application Was Filed Under Section 25 of Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.

6 Jan 2022

The Supreme Court addressed a jurisdictional question concerning judicial review of transfer orders passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal unde...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)