Search Results for "Cannabis"

10 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeal in NDPS Act Case, Modifying Sentence on Double Punishment Grounds. Separate sentences for offences under Sections 20 and 25/29 from same transaction held impermissible, and fine cannot be cumulative when sentences run concurrently under Section 53 IPC.

The appeal arose from a conviction under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The appellant and a co-accused were intercepted dur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Commercial Quantity of Ganja Seized Validates Denial of Bail: Bombay High Court. Neutral material in contraband considered in totality under NDPS Act.

The Bombay High Court denied bail to the applicant under the NDPS Act, reaffirming that the entire quantity of contraband, including neutral materia...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Temporary Bail Granted on Humanitarian Grounds to Pregnant Applicant Accused Under NDPS Act. Compassion prevails as court considers advanced pregnancy for temporary bail, balancing human dignity and legal rigor.

1. Case Background Crime: Possession of “Ganja” (Cannabis) in commercial quantity. Registration: Crime No. 92/2024 under Sections 20(b)(ii), 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Convictions in Ganja Seizure Case Quashed by Supreme Court due to Procedural Violations. The Supreme Court acquits the accused in a narcotics case, citing flaws in search, seizure, and evidence handling.

The Supreme Court overturned the convictions of the appellants under the NDPS Act due to procedural lapses in search, seizure, sampling, and chain of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeal in NDPS Act Case, Reducing Sentence to Period Already Served. Conviction Under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) Upheld for Transporting 3327 kg of Ganja, but Sentence Modified Due to Appellant's Mitigating Circumstances as Indigent Helper.

The appeal arose from a conviction under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, for transporting 3327 kg of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in NDPS Case Due to Lack of Conscious Possession and Flawed Investigation. Conviction for cannabis recovery quashed as prosecution failed to prove ownership and possession beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 8C, 20(b)(ii)(c), 35, 54 of NDPS Act.

The appellant, Gangadhar alias Gangaram, was convicted under Section 8C read with Section 20(b)(ii)(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substanc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers to Three-Judge Bench the Question Whether Quantity of Mixture or Pure Drug Content Determines Punishment Under NDPS Act. The Court Held That E. Micheal Raj Requires Reconsideration as It Omitted Note 2 of Notification and the Scheme of the Act Treating Preparations as a Whole.

The Supreme Court, in a reference arising from multiple appeals and writ petitions, considered the correctness of the decision in E. Micheal Raj v. In...