Search Results for "Employees' Provident Fund"

Trending :

Search Results for "Employees' Provident Fund"

11 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Tribal Chieftains in Land Acquisition Case Under Assam Lushai Hills District (Acquisition of Chief's Rights) Act, 1954. The petition was barred by delay and laches, and the acquisition of chiefs' lands with compensation under the Act did not violate fundamental rights to property.

13 Mar 2026

The writ petition was filed by the Mizo Chief Council on behalf of tribal chieftains and their legal heirs from the erstwhile Lushai Hills district, n...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition by Retired Employees in Pension Scheme Dispute, Upholding State's Authority to Repeal Welfare Measure with Cut-off Date. Denial of Pensionary Benefits Under Himachal Pradesh Corporate Sector Employees Scheme, 1999, After Repeal on 02.12.2004, is Valid as It Does Not Alter Accrued Rights Under Employees' Provident Fund Scheme, 1995.

16 Apr 2025

The dispute involved three retired officers of the Himachal Pradesh State Forest Development Corporation Limited, a state-owned entity, who filed a pe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Pension Claims for UPSRTC Employees Not Holding Permanent Pensionable Posts. The Supreme Court upheld the regulations and government orders, denying pension benefits to UPSRTC employees who did not hold permanent pensionable posts, emphasizing adherence to existing rules and addressing delayed claims.

26 Jul 2024

This judgment discusses the eligibility of employees of the Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (UPSRTC) for pension benefits, based on var...

Supreme Court

Taxation Provisions: Section 17(2)(viii) and Rule 3(7)(i) of Income Tax Act. Navigating the Boundaries of Legislative Delegation and Ensuring Equity in Taxation

7 May 2024

Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 17(2)(viii) and Rule 3(7)(i) - Constitutionality - Taxation of Fringe Benefits or Amenities - Essential Legislative Fu...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Secured Creditor's Appeal in Priority Dispute Between SARFAESI Act and MSMED Act. SARFAESI Act's Express Priority Provisions Under Section 26E Prevail Over MSMED Act's Recovery Mechanism, as No Conflict Exists and Priority Must Be Expressly Provided.

5 Jan 2023

The dispute arose from conflicting recovery claims under the SARFAESI Act and MSMED Act against a debtor, Mission Vivacare, which had defaulted on loa...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Private Security Agency Against EPF Coverage — Security Guards Held Employees of Agency, Not Clients. The court held that a private security agency providing security guards on payment basis is covered under the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, as it renders expert services under G.S.R. 805 dated 17.05.1971.

2 Dec 2020

The appellant, M/s. Panther Security Service Private Limited, is a private security agency registered under the Private Security Agencies (Regulation)...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Provident Fund Office Against Garment Company — Holds Home-Based Women Workers Are Employees Under EPF Act. Piece-Rate Payment and Work From Home Do Not Exclude Workers from Definition of 'Employee' Under Section 2(f) of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

24 Jul 2019

The present civil appeal arose from a challenge to the Bombay High Court's order dated 27.04.2012, which had set aside the Provident Fund Officer's de...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Employer Seeking Exclusion of Retired Railway Employees from EPF Coverage. Retired Employees Who Withdrew Full GPF Accumulations Are Not 'Excluded Employees' Under Paragraph 2(f) of the Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952, as the Term 'Fund' Refers Only to the EPF Fund Established Under the Act.

26 Mar 2019

The case involves an appeal by Modern Transportation Consultation Services Pvt. Ltd. and its director against the judgment of the Division Bench of th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Educational Institute in Gratuity Dispute — Teacher Held Entitled to Gratuity Under Amended Definition. The Court applied the retrospective amendment to Section 2(e) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, which included teachers as employees, and upheld the orders of the controlling authority and High Court.

7 Mar 2019

The appeal arose from a dispute between Birla Institute of Technology (BIT) and a retired Assistant Professor (respondent No.4) regarding payment of g...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Institute's Appeal in Gratuity Dispute — Retrospective Amendment Covers Teachers Under Payment of Gratuity Act. Teacher's Claim for Gratuity Upheld as Amended Definition of 'Employee' Includes Teachers with Retrospective Effect from 1997.

7 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court of India dealt with an appeal by Birla Institute of Technology (BIT) against the State of Jharkhand and others, concerning the entit...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)