Search Results for "Excisable goods"

10 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Interpretation Of Manufacturing Process Under Factories Act, 1948 – Business Of Laundry Held To Constitute Manufacturing Process – Premises Deemed A Factory – Order Issuing Process Restored.

a. Definition of manufacturing process under Section 2(k) includes washing and cleaning for delivery and use – Laundry service falls squarely within...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court's Landmark Decision on Valuation Under Central Excise Act, 1944: Bharat Petroleum vs. Commissioner of Central Excise" "Defining Transaction Value in the Sale of Petroleum Products Between Public Sector Undertakings Under the Central Excise Act."

The judgment clarifies the determination of "transaction value" under Section 4(1) of the Central Excise Act for sales made between public sector oil ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Rules in Favor of Petitioner on Rebate Claims for Exported Biscuits. Central Excise Exemption Does Not Apply to Exported Goods Without Retail Sale Price; Rebate of Paid Duty Granted.

The Bombay High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, Parle Products Ltd., allowing their claim for a rebate of excise duty paid on exported biscuit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals on Chewing Tobacco Packaging Valuation Under Central Excise Act. The Court affirms that HDPE bags sold by the respondent-assessee qualify as wholesale packages, exempting them from retail sale valuation under Section 4A of the Excise Act.

The appeals challenge the judgment dated 7th November 2008 by the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, addressing whether the goods so...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Industrial Tariff for Manufacturing Activity in Electricity Tariff Dispute. Appellate Authority's Decision Affirmed; R&D Activity Categorized as Manufacturing, No Unauthorized Use of Electricity Found

The petition challenges an order from the Appellate Authority under the Electricity Act which determined the tariff category for the respondent’s ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Affirms CESTAT's Ruling: Labelling Constitutes Manufacturing under Central Excise Law. The Supreme Court clarifies the interpretation of "manufacture" under Note 3 of Chapter 18 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, supporting the respondent's cenvat credit claim.

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether labelling goods amounts to "manufacture" under the Central Excise Tariff Act. The case revolved aroun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Duty Drawback Interest Case, Upholding High Court's Award of Interest for Delayed Refund. Clarificatory Circulars Under Exim Policy Have Retrospective Effect, Making Contractor Eligible for Duty Drawback and Interest Under Sections 27A and 75A of Customs Act, 1962.

The dispute arose from the respondent's claim for duty drawback under the deemed export scheme for civil construction work in the Koyna Hydro Electric...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal Against Confiscation Orders Under Central Excise Act and SARFAESI Act. Commissioner's Use of Omitted Rule 173Q(2) Invalid and SARFAESI Act Grants Priority to Secured Creditors Over Excise Dues.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court dismissing a writ petition filed by Punjab National Bank. The bank had extended credit fa...