Search Results for "Freedom of Speech"

15 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 15 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes FIR Under Section 295A IPC and Section 67 IT Act in WhatsApp Group Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Insufficient Evidence -- Petitioner Acquitted of Religious Offence Charges

The Karnataka High Court allowed a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash an FIR registered under Section 295A IPC and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashed FIR And Charge Sheet Against Petitioners For Lack Of Prima Facie Evidence — Reaffirmed Right To Peaceful Assembly Under Article 19(1)(b) Of The Constitution Of India

Constitution Of India, 1950 — Article 226 — Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 482 — Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Sections 143, 145, 147, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashed Criminal Defamation Proceedings Against Editorial Director and Journalists for Non-Compliance with Section 202 CrPC

Issuance of Summons Without Mandatory Inquiry Under Section 202 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) Held Vitiated – No Presumption Against Edito...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court's Landmark Judgment: Balancing Fundamental Rights with Societal Interests. Ensuring Justice with Constitutional Safeguards.

The Supreme Court delivered a significant judgment addressing the interpretation and interplay of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19, and 21 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Court Dismisses Plea to Stay Film ‘MATCH FIXING’; Film Deemed Fictionalized with Disclaimer" "Creative freedom upheld; no adverse impact on pending trial in Special Case No. 1 of 2016."

1. Petition Overview: Petition Filed: Seeking a stay on the release of the film "MATCH FIXING" until Special Case No. 1 of 2016 is decided. Ground...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

2023 Amendment to IT Rules Struck Down as Unconstitutional. Division Bench of Bombay High Court declares the 2023 amendment to Rule 3(1)(b)(v) of IT (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 unconstitutional, citing violation of constitutional rights.

  Subject of Challenge (Para 1):The case challenges the validity of the amendment dated 6th April 2023 to Rule 3(1)(b)(v) of the Information...