Search Results for "Inter-se Seniority"

Trending :

Search Results for "Inter-se Seniority"

10 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Direct Recruits in Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Seniority Dispute, Upholding Their Seniority from Initial Appointment Dates. Court Holds That Training Period Must Be Counted for Seniority Under Regulations 10(9) and 87 of Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (Service Regulations), 1967, and Administrative Circulars Cannot Override Statutory Provisions.

11 Mar 2026

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of civil appeals concerning inter-se seniority disputes between directly recruited and internally selected Assista...

High Court

"High Court Rules on Seniority Dispute Between Promotee and Directly Appointed Deputy Collectors" "Balancing the Scales: A Landmark Judgment on Promotion and Seniority in Government Service."

8 Aug 2024

The Bombay High Court recently delivered a significant judgment addressing the long-standing issue of seniority between Promotee Deputy Collectors (PD...

Supreme Court

Challenging Minimum Qualifying Marks in Judicial Appointments: Upholding Constitutional Integrity Exploring the Constitutionality of Viva Voce Criteria in Bihar and Gujarat District Judiciary Selection Processes

6 May 2024

The constitutionality of rules prescribing minimum qualifying marks in the viva voce test for appointments to the District Judiciary in Bihar and Guja...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Cantonment Board Promotion Dispute, Reinstating Appellant's Promotion Based on Seniority from Higher Pay Scale. Promotion to Office Superintendent Under Cantonment Fund Servant Rules, 1937 Upheld as Appellant's Seniority in Feeder Cadre Determined by Higher Pay Scale, Not Date of Appointment.

2 Mar 2022

The dispute arose from a promotion conflict within the Cantonment Board, Ranikhet, involving the appellant and the respondent, both employees vying fo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant in Service Law Seniority Dispute Based on Select Panel Merit. Seniority of Direct Recruits Determined by Order of Merit in Select Panel Under DoPT OM Dated 3 July 1986, Not Date of Joining, as 1971 Rules Were Silent on Inter-Se Seniority for Combined All India List.

26 Oct 2021

The dispute arose from the Military Engineering Service, where candidates were selected in 1983 for Superintendent posts across five Commands but some...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Direct Recruit District Judges' Challenge to Seniority Determination in Madhya Pradesh Higher Judicial Services. Seniority Based on Date of Appointment Upheld, with 2017 Rules Applied Prospectively Under Rule 11, Denying Retrospective Roster-Based Seniority as Sought by Petitioners.

12 Aug 2021

The dispute arose from two writ petitions filed by directly recruited District Judges in the Madhya Pradesh Higher Judicial Services, challenging the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Service Law Seniority Dispute, Overturning High Court Reliance on Per Incuriam Precedent. Seniority of Assistant Engineers Must Be Counted from Date of Regularization Under Uttar Pradesh Regularisation Rules, 1979 and 1989 Rules, Not from Initial Ad Hoc Appointments.

28 Jul 2021

The Supreme Court of India, in a civil appellate jurisdiction, addressed a group of appeals concerning the seniority determination of Assistant Engine...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeals in Bihar Staff Selection Commission Examination Dispute — Expert Committee Report Accepted for Correcting Answers. The Court upheld the validity of increased vacancies and candidates, and directed revision of results based on expert opinion while protecting existing appointees.

6 May 2020

The case pertains to a dispute arising from the Graduate Level Combined Examination-2010 conducted by the Bihar Staff Selection Commission (BSSC) for ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Preference for Direct Recruit Assistants Over Non-Graduate Promotees in Tamil Nadu Revenue Subordinate Service. Rule Read Down to Exclude Graduate Promotees from Discrimination.

12 Mar 2019

The case involves a dispute over the implementation of amended Rule 5(g) and Annexure-III item (ii) of the Tamil Nadu Revenue Subordinate Service Rule...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appellants to Retain Jobs Despite Lack of Eligibility on Cut-off Date in Junior Engineer Selection Case. Court Holds That While Eligibility Must Be Determined as on Cut-off Date, Equitable Relief Can Be Granted Based on Long Service and Other Factors.

1 Jan 2019

The case pertains to the selection and appointment of Junior Engineers (Elect) Grade II in the State of Jammu and Kashmir. The Services Selection Boar...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)