Search Results for "Lapse of Acquisition"

17 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 17 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Appeals by Appellant Challenging Land Acquisition for APMC Mega Market -- Acquisition Upheld Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Karnataka Amendment Act 33/1991

Appellant filed writ appeals against the dismissal of its writ petitions challenging land acquisition for an APMC Mega Market. The Trust owned lands i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Land acquisition and resettlement challenges dismissed due to unexplained delay in follow-up and abandonment of initial relief under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.

The petition, filed by the heirs of Babasaheb Pirjade, contested the acquisition of their agricultural land under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, clai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Development Authority in Land Acquisition Lapse Dispute. Acquisition Does Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) as Possession Was Taken, Despite Non-Payment of Compensation, Following Constitution Bench Ruling in Indore Development Authority.

The dispute arose from a land acquisition matter where the Delhi Development Authority appealed against a High Court judgment that declared the acquis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by State and Development Corporation in Land Acquisition Lapse Dispute - High Court's Declaration of Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Set Aside for Reconsideration.

The Supreme Court addressed a group of appeals filed by the Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited and the State ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Land Acquisition Cases Due to Lapse Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act. Acquisition Proceedings Initiated Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Lapsed as Compensation Was Deposited with Collector But Not Paid to Landowners, Failing Statutory Requirement.

The Supreme Court disposed of a bunch of appeals involving common questions of law and fact regarding land acquisition proceedings. The background inv...