Search Results for "Limited Competitive Examination"

9 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Promotion and Seniority in Judicial Services: A Fair Review. Restoring justice for promotion and seniority in Jharkhand Superior Judicial Service.

The Supreme Court of India held that judicial officers who successfully qualified for the suitability test for promotion under the 65% promotional quo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Recruitment Rules of 2015, Dismisses Petition Challenging RFO Seniority List. Petitioners' reliance on superseded 1998 Rules and failure to include all affected parties lead to dismissal; seniority list validated under 2015 Rules.

The petitioners challenged the seniority list based on the Recruitment Rules of 1998, arguing against the application of the Recruitment Rules of 2015...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Judicial Officer's Appeal in Seniority Dispute Under West Bengal Judicial Service Rules. High Court's Administrative Decision to Rectify Promotion Delay by Fixing Seniority Against 2004-2008 Vacancies Upheld as Valid, Setting Aside High Court Orders.

The dispute concerned a judicial officer's seniority fixation in the West Bengal Higher Judicial Service. The appellant joined the Judicial Service in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Judicial Officer Discharged During Probation and Quashes Discharge Order. Discharge Based on Bail Order and Pending Inquiry Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice and Is Arbitrary Under Rajasthan Judicial Services Rules, 2010 and Article 233 of Constitution of India.

The dispute involved a judicial officer appointed as an Additional District Judge in 2013 under the Rajasthan Judicial Services Rules, 2010, who was d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes High Court Resolution on Seniority of District Judges Promoted Through Limited Competitive Examination. Merit-Based Seniority Upheld as Administrative Committee's Decision Contravened Supreme Court Directives and Madhya Pradesh Higher Judicial Services Rules, 1994.

The dispute concerned District Judges in Madhya Pradesh who were appointed to the Higher Judicial Services through Limited Competitive Examinations (L...