Search Results for "Pay Revision"

Trending :

Search Results for "Pay Revision"

7 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7 result(s)

High Court

High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Orders Treating Termination Period as Break in Service and Recovery of Excess Amount from Pensionary Benefits. Reinstatement Without Back Wages Does Not Imply Break in Service, and Recovery from Retired Employee is Impermissible Under Supreme Court Guidelines.

27 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by a former driver employed by the Zilla Parishad, Kolhapur, challenging orders that declared his termina...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Rejected Pay Revision of 2015 – Held Unfair Labour Practice. Labour Law – Industrial Disputes – Pay Fixation – Supreme Court Affirmed 2010 Pay Fixation – Quashed 2015 Revision – No Recovery from Workmen Permitted

27 Feb 2025

Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 136 – Special Leave Petition – Labour Rights – Supreme Court Declined Interference &ndas...

High Court

Employees Win Relief Against Post-Retirement Recovery of Alleged Overpayments. Bombay High Court halts post-retirement recovery efforts, citing lack of employee fault and absence of relevant undertakings.

16 Oct 2024

The High Court ruled in favor of retired Zilla Parishad employees, halting recoveries for alleged excess payments due to revised pay scales. The Court...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Rules on Wage Revision and Jurisdictional Limits of High Courts in Industrial Disputes. Supreme Court clarifies the scope of High Court intervention in Tribunal awards related to wage revisions and workmen's demands.

9 Apr 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a set of appeals arising from a dispute between VVF India Limited and its workmen's union, examined the jurisdictional ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Pay Revision Discrimination Case Against Maharashtra State Financial Corporation - Fixation of Cut-off Date for Fifth Pay Commission Benefits to Retired Employees Held Arbitrary Under Article 14 of the Constitution. The court ruled that denying benefits to employees who retired between 01.01.2006 and 29.03.2010, while granting retrospective benefits from 01.01.2006 to those in service on 29.03.2010, constitutes hostile discrimination as all formed a homogenous class during the revision period.

2 Feb 2023

The Supreme Court heard an appeal concerning the fixation of a cut-off date for implementing Fifth Pay Commission recommendations for employees of the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reviews Industrial Dispute Over Contract Labour Wages and Settlement Binding Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. High Court Sustained Tribunal Award on Substantive Issues but Remanded for Individual Wage Scale Determination Due to Tribunal's Failure to Apply Basis to Facts.

4 Feb 2022

The dispute originated from a Direct Action notice raised by the Oil Field Employees Association on 26 August 2016, representing workmen engaged by co...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Retired Employees in Cooperative Bank Pension Dispute - Pension Scheme Cannot Be Unilaterally Discontinued After Employees Have Opted and Availed Benefits Under Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Development Banks Employees Pension, Family Pension and General Provident Fund Rules, 1989. The Court held that pension is a deferred wage and accrued right, and amendments to service rules under Section 84A(2) of Punjab Cooperative Societies Act, 1961 must be prospective, protecting employees' legitimate expectations.

11 Jan 2022

The dispute arose from the Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Development Bank Ltd.'s decision to discontinue a pension scheme introduced in 1989 f...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)