Search Results for "Possession of Flats"

11 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Flat Buyers, Upholds Commission's Order Exonerating Landowners from Joint Liability with Developer for Deficiency in Service Under Consumer Protection Act, 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by flat buyers seeking to hold landowners jointly and severally liable with the developer for delay in handing ove...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

No Limitation for Cooperative Society Dues: Bombay High Court Affirms Recovery from Flat Occupants under Section 154B-29 MCS Act

The Bombay High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging recovery certificates issued by a cooperative housing society for long-pending maintenance ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Ordered Official Liquidator to Handover Possession of Tenanted Premises to the Landlords. The Court Held That Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Considered as Assets of the Company in Liquidation and Directed the Official Liquidator to Return Possession of Flats in Question.

The Court reaffirmed its wide powers under Section 446 of the Companies Act. Held that tenancy rights are not considered assets for the purpose of wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs Compensation for Delayed Possession in Fiesta Homes Project. The Supreme Court mandates compensation for homebuyers, correcting NCDRC's oversight of the construction agreement's possession date.

The appellants, along with proforma respondents, filed a complaint against the first respondent-builder for delay in handing over possession of flats ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Class Action in Consumer Dispute Over Non-Delivery of Commercial Units. The Court Held That Sameness of Interest, Not Identical Cause of Action, Is Required for Class Action Under Section 12(1)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dismissing a complaint filed by 44 appellants under Section 12...