Search Results for "Section 12(1)(c)"

Trending :

Search Results for "Section 12(1)(c)"

9 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9 result(s)

High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in RTE Act Case Due to Prior Availment of Benefit. Fresh Admission Under 25% Quota Denied as Petitioner's Son Had Already Secured Admission in Previous Academic Year, Defeating Equitable Distribution Under Section 12(1)(c) of Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.

7 Mar 2026

The writ petition was filed by a father seeking a direction for the respondents to accept his son's admission form under the 25% reservation quota of ...

High Court

Court Declares Maharashtra's RTE Amendment Rules 2024 Ultra Vires. Maharashtra's new education amendment restricting private school admissions overturned, safeguarding disadvantaged children's right to education.

19 Jul 2024

The petitions challenge the Maharashtra Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education (Amendment) Rules, 2024, which add provisos to Rules 4(5) a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Class Action by Homebuyers Under Section 35(1)(c) of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Builder's Objection on Miniscule Percentage Rejected. Commonality of Interest Found in Delay in Possession and Unfair Trade Practices, Allowing Representative Complaint for All 1134 Apartment Purchasers.

17 Dec 2021

The case involves an appeal by Brigade Enterprises Limited, a builder, against an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC)...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Protection Case, Directs Consideration of Condonation of Delay Application on Merits. The Court held that the Constitution Bench judgment in New India Assurance Company Limited vs. Hilli Multipurpose Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd. operates prospectively, so applications for condonation of delay filed prior to it must be considered on merits under Section 13(2)(a) read with Section 18 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

6 Dec 2021

The appeal arose from a decision of the National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 19th November 2020, which dismissed an interim ap...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Joint Consumer Complaint by Flat Buyers Under Section 12(1)(c) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Common Grievance Sufficient Despite Different Dates, Costs, and Sizes. NCDRC's Dismissal Set Aside, Matter Remitted for Fresh Consideration.

24 Aug 2020

The appeal arose from an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 19 February 2016, which dismissed a consumer compl...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Flat Buyers Against Developer for Delayed Possession, Holds Unilateral Compensation Clause Unfair. Developer's stipulation of Rs 5 per sq ft per month as liquidated damages for delay held inadequate and unconscionable; flat buyers entitled to compensation at 6% per annum on amounts paid.

24 Aug 2020

The case involves appeals by 171 flat buyers against the dismissal of their consumer complaint by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Class Action in Consumer Dispute Over Non-Delivery of Commercial Units. The Court Held That Sameness of Interest, Not Identical Cause of Action, Is Required for Class Action Under Section 12(1)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

10 May 2019

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dismissing a complaint filed by 44 appellants under Section 12...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Flat Purchasers' Appeal in Consumer Dispute Against Developer for Delayed Possession — Interest Extended Until Actual Possession. The Court held that the developer cannot avoid liability for interest by denying possession due to the filing of a consumer complaint, and the contractual compensation rate was inadequate under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

11 Feb 2019

The case involves a consumer dispute between flat purchasers and a developer, Mantri Castles Pvt. Ltd., regarding delayed possession of flats in Banga...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Flat Purchasers' Appeal in Consumer Dispute Against Developer for Delayed Possession — Interest Extended Until Actual Possession. The court held that the NCDRC's limitation of interest to 31 July 2016 was unjustified as many purchasers had not received possession, and the contractual compensation rate was inadequate under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

11 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court of India heard two sets of appeals against an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 8 June 2018...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)