Search Results for "Section 3(1)(x)"

10 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Matter to Chief Justice on Advocates' Misconduct in Vexatious SLP Filing. Advocates Filed Second SLP with Incorrect Statements After Dismissal of First, Tendered Unconditional Apology, Leading to Divergent Judicial Opinions Under Supreme Court Rules, 2013.

The Supreme Court was confronted with a case involving misconduct by advocates in filing a vexatious special leave petition. The petitioner, convicted...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Conviction in SC/ST Act Case Based on Compromise Between Parties. Court Invoked Article 142 Powers to Override Non-Compoundability Under Section 320 Cr.P.C., Holding That Genuine Settlement in Private Dispute Warrants Quashing When Appeal is Pending.

The dispute originated from a property conflict between neighbors, Ramawatar and Prembai, which escalated into an incident on June 26, 1994, where Ram...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Charges Under SC/ST Act for Lack of Caste-Based Insult and Public View Requirement. Allegations of Land Dispute Do Not Attract Section 3(1)(r) of SC/ST Act as Insult Not on Account of Caste and Incident Occurred Inside Building Not in Public View.

The appellant, Hitesh Verma, challenged the order of the High Court of Uttarakhand dismissing his petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in SC/ST Act Case — Acquits Appellant Under Section 3(1)(x) Due to Doubt Over Caste-Based Abuse. Conviction under Section 294 IPC Upheld as Abuse Was Proven.

The appellant, Narad Patel, was tried in Special Case No.13 of 2002 before the Special Judge, Raigarh, Chhattisgarh, for offences under Sections 294 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence on Identification and Weapon. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove light source for identification and which firearm caused fatal injury.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Ashoksinh Jayendrasinh, setting aside his conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC, Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Doubtful Identification and Lack of Evidence. The High Court's acquittal of accused No.2 was upheld as a plausible view based on contradictions in evidence and darkness at the time of incident.

The State of Gujarat appealed against the High Court's acquittal of respondent Kalusinh @ Harpalsinh Bhamarsinh (accused No.2) in a murder case. The i...