Search Results for "Section 34(4)"

5 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case, Restoring Arbitral Award Set Aside by Single Judge. Limited Judicial Review Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Precludes Re-appreciation of Evidence Unless Award Shocks Conscience or Conflicts with Public Policy.

The dispute arose between Appellant, a foreign company manufacturing biscuits in Zimbabwe, and Respondent, an Indian partnership firm, regarding the s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Retrospective Effect of Unconstitutional Provisions – Arbitral Tribunal Directed to Reconsider Solatium – Judicial Discretion Under Section 34(4) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Upheld

National Highways Act, 1956 – Section 3(J) Declared Unconstitutional – Arbitral Award Remitted for Solatium Consideration – Writ Petition Dismis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Bombay High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Application Under Section 115 CPC in Light of Section 34(4) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act" "Applicants must seek remedy before the Appellate Bench under the MRC Act, not directly before the High Court."

The Bombay High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Application filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, stating that the proper r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Civil Appeal in Arbitration Dispute, Restoring Arbitral Award Modified by Lower Courts. Judicial Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is Limited, and Courts Cannot Re-appreciate Evidence or Modify Awards on Merits.

The dispute arose from a construction contract between a civil engineering contractor and the Karnataka State Public Works Department for building off...