Search Results for "Section 35E"

Trending :

Search Results for "Section 35E"

5 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5 result(s)

Supreme Court

High Court Dismisses Manufacturer's Appeals in Central Excise Classification Dispute. Classification of Benzene and Toluene Based on Purity Under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and Procedural Compliance Under Central Excise Rules, 1944 Were Upheld by Tribunal.

28 Apr 2025

The appeals arose from a common order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) concerning classification and duty demands on...

High Court

High Court Rules in Favor of Petitioner on Rebate Claims for Exported Biscuits. Central Excise Exemption Does Not Apply to Exported Goods Without Retail Sale Price; Rebate of Paid Duty Granted.

21 Oct 2024

The Bombay High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, Parle Products Ltd., allowing their claim for a rebate of excise duty paid on exported biscuit...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Rules on Jurisdiction in Excise Duty Rebate Claims Bombay High Court establishes jurisdiction for writ petitions filed by companies challenging the rejection of excise duty rebates. Court confirms maintainability of writ petitions in cases involving orders from Revisionary Authorities located within Mumbai.

4 Sep 2024

The Bombay High Court ruled on the issue of territorial jurisdiction regarding excise duty rebate claims. The court held that the writ petitions were ...

High Court

Court Directs Cash Refund: Writ Petitions Grant Relief on CENVAT Credit. Judgement rules in favor of petitioners, mandates cash refund under Section 142(3) of CGST Act, 2017 for excess duty payments.

10 Jun 2024

Writ Petition Outcome captures the essence of the court's decision to grant relief based on the interpretation of Section 142(3) of the CGST Act, 2017...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Refund Recovery Case - Clarifies No Separate Section 11A Notice Required When Refund Order Reviewed Under Section 35E. Recovery of erroneous refund granted through speaking order reviewed under Section 35E of Central Excise Act, 1944 does not require separate show cause notice under Section 11A, as Sections 35E and 11A operate in different fields with different purposes and time limits.

24 Mar 2023

The dispute originated from the respondent company's manufacture of cotton yarn consumed captively in its composite mills for weaving fabric. Followin...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)