Search Results for "Section 494 IPC"

6 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Proceedings Against In-Laws in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. Vague and Omnibus Allegations Against Family Members Without Active Involvement Do Not Attract Offences Under Sections 498A and 494 IPC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the accused-appellants, who were the father-in-law, mother-in-law, and sister-in-law of the complainant,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition in Cheque Dishonour Case, Upholds Jurisdiction Under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

Bank’s Right to Choose Jurisdiction for Cheque Dishonour Cases Upheld – Transfer Denied Under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Emphasizes Proportional Sentencing in Bigamy Case. Lenient punishment for bigamy under Section 494 IPC revised to ensure justice and uphold societal interests.

The principles of sentencing in criminal law, specifically focusing on the offense of bigamy under Section 494 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The cas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Bigamy Charges Appellants Exonerated Due to Insufficient Evidence

Criminal Law - Bigamy - Accomplice Liability - Quashing of Proceedings Bigamy, Accomplice Liability, Section 494 IPC, Common Intention, Quashing of P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Summoning Order in PMLA Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Special Court in Ghaziabad Lacked Jurisdiction as Money-Laundering Offence Allegedly Committed in Maharashtra, Under Section 44(1) of Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002.

The dispute arose from a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India challenging a summoning order issued by the Special Judge, Anti-C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Husband in Divorce Case Based on Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage Under Article 142 of Constitution. Marriage Dissolved as Parties Lived Apart for Almost Two Decades and Reconciliation Was Impossible, Despite Lack of Statutory Ground in Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

The dispute involved a husband and wife who married in 2002 under Hindu rites, but the marriage never consummated and broke down immediately, with the...