Search Results for "TGT"

6 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Auroville Foundation’s Authority, Sets Aside High Court’s Decision on Standing Order No. 1/2022. Governing Board’s Powers Prevail Over Residents’ Assembly in Auroville Development Dispute

Suppression of Material Facts: A litigant invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution must come wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Modifies High Court Judgment on Partition of Ancestral Properties. Respondents' entitlement to shares adjusted; self-acquired properties excluded from partition.

Civil Appeals challenge the judgment of the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, in R.F.A. No.3052 of 2010 and Cross-objection No. 103 of 2011. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of PTI Selection by Haryana Staff Selection Commission Due to Arbitrary Change in Criteria. The selection process violated Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution as the Commission altered the marking scheme after interviews without any rational basis.

The case pertains to a batch of appeals arising from a common judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which quashed the selection of Physical T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Teacher Promotion Case — C&V Teachers Not Entitled to TGT Quota for Headmaster Post. Rule 9(5) of Haryana School Education (Group C) State Cadre Service Rules, 2012 only gives notional conversion to TGT cadre, not eligibility for promotion against TGT quota.

The State of Haryana appealed against a Division Bench order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court which had allowed writ petitions filed by Sandeep Si...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Pay Fixation Dispute Under CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008. Rule 11 Applies When Employee Opts for Revised Pay from Date of ACP Upgradation, Not Rule 7.

The case involves a dispute over the correct rule for pay fixation under the Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008. The respondent, Raj Kum...