Search Results for "call detail records"

Trending :

Search Results for "call detail records"

15 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 15 result(s)

High Court

High Court Dismisses Appeal in Murder Conviction Under Sections 302/34 and 120-B IPC - Conviction upheld based on complete chain of circumstantial evidence and reliable eye-witness testimony. Appellant's guilt established through last seen theory, recovery of weapon, and conduct, with no interference warranted in trial court's judgment.

16 Mar 2026

The appeal arose from a judgment dated 27.09.2018 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, in Sessions Trial No. 35 of 2016, convicting the appellant ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence and Inadmissible Electronic Records. Conviction Overturned as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Based on Call Detail Records Without Section 65-B Certificate and Unreliable Recovery Evidence Under Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

10 Mar 2026

The dispute involved a criminal appeal against conviction for murder under Sections 302/34 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The appellant, Poor...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashed FIR and Proceedings in Special Case No.52/2020 Against Applicant – Held FIR Lacked Prima Facie Case and Sanction Under Section 196(1A) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Was Not Obtained

5 Mar 2025

The Court Held That the Criminal Proceedings Were Manifestly Attended With Mala Fide and Instituted With Ulterior Motive – No Sufficient Evidence to...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused in NIA Heroin Smuggling Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Prolonged Incarceration. Transnational Narcotics Conspiracy Allegation Fails as No Contraband Linked to Appellant's Consignment and Key Witnesses Not Implicated.

1 Jan 2025

The Supreme Court granted bail to Harpreet Singh Talwar @ Kabir Talwar, accused in a multi-jurisdictional heroin smuggling case investigated by the NI...

Supreme Court

Prosecution's Case Fails: Appellant Acquitted of Bribery Charges. Inconsistencies and Lack of Evidence Lead to Appellant's Acquittal in High-Profile Bribery Case

10 Jul 2024

The prosecution failed to substantiate the charge under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d)(i) and (ii) of the Act against the appellant (AO1). The evidence did n...

Supreme Court

Kidnapping Case Falls Apart: Court Acquits Accused Due to Procedural Flaws and Insufficient Evidence. A detailed examination of a kidnapping case reveals significant investigation lapses, leading to the acquittal of the accused and raising concerns about the integrity of the prosecution.

9 Jul 2024

A kidnapping case involving Sachin Garg and the subsequent legal proceedings. The key issues highlighted include procedural flaws, inconsistencies in ...

High Court

Bail Granted: Applicant under Sections 302, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

5 Jul 2024

Applicant facing charges under IPC and Arms Act, sought bail under Section 439 of CrPC. The case involves allegations stemming from a murder conspirac...

High Court

Court Overturns Conviction Under Incorrect Section of Corruption Act. Appeal Allowed; Case Remanded for Correct Charges and Fresh Proceedings

5 Jul 2024

The trial court convicted the accused under Section 8 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. However, the defense argued that Section 8 was incorr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Bail Appeal in Terrorism Case Under UAPA Due to Prima Facie Evidence and National Security Risks. Bail Denied as Court Found Reasonable Grounds to Believe Accusation True Under Section 43D(5) of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, Based on Disclosure Statements and Terror Module Involvement.

1 Feb 2024

The appeal arose from the dismissal of a bail application by the appellant, an accused in a terrorism-related case involving charges under the Indian ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused in UAPA Case Due to Prolonged Incarceration and Weak Evidence. Bail was allowed as appellants were in custody for over four years without charges framed, and evidence under Sections 120B and 302 IPC and UAPA provisions was insufficient to deny bail.

17 Apr 2023

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by two accused persons, identified as accused nos. 46 and 47, who were charged with offences under the Unlawful...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)