Search Results for "limited departmental competitive examination"

Trending :

Search Results for "limited departmental competitive examination"

6 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6 result(s)

High Court

Seniority and Back Wages in Delayed Appointments: High Court Rules on Deemed Date of Appointment for Postal Employees. Bombay High Court Grants Deemed Date of Appointment to Postal Employees, Denies Back Wages to Some Petitioners

17 Feb 2025

Deemed Date of Appointment – Petitioners, who were selected in the same recruitment process but appointed later due to administrative delays, were ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Administrative Resolution on Judicial Promotions Under Haryana Superior Judicial Service Rules 2007. The Court Held That the High Court Could Prescribe Separate Minimum Marks in Written Test and Viva Voce Through Administrative Resolution Under Article 235 of the Constitution, as It Supplemented the Statutory Rules to Ensure Merit-Based Assessment.

13 Feb 2024

The dispute arose from a batch of appeals challenging a judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court regarding the appointment of thirteen in-service...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs High Court to Adjust Future Recruitments for Quota Breaches in Judicial Appointments. Compliance with 10% quota for limited departmental competitive examination mandated from 1.1.2011, with excess appointments to be adjusted in future recruitments as per Supreme Court directions in All India Judges' Association case.

13 Mar 2023

The dispute originated from a writ petition filed before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh challenging appointments to the higher judiciary. The petiti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Pay Revision Discrimination Case Against Maharashtra State Financial Corporation - Fixation of Cut-off Date for Fifth Pay Commission Benefits to Retired Employees Held Arbitrary Under Article 14 of the Constitution. The court ruled that denying benefits to employees who retired between 01.01.2006 and 29.03.2010, while granting retrospective benefits from 01.01.2006 to those in service on 29.03.2010, constitutes hostile discrimination as all formed a homogenous class during the revision period.

2 Feb 2023

The Supreme Court heard an appeal concerning the fixation of a cut-off date for implementing Fifth Pay Commission recommendations for employees of the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Employer in Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme Dispute Over Application Date. The Court set aside the Delhi High Court's direction to apply the MACP scheme from 01-01-2006, holding that the scheme's effective date of 01-09-2008 under the office memorandum dated 19-05-2009 was valid, and employees not completing 24 years of service by that date were not entitled to benefits under the superseded ACP scheme.

8 Mar 2022

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of appeals concerning the applicability date of the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACP) introduced b...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Assured Career Progression Scheme Case Due to Employee's Refusal of Regular Promotion. Financial Upgradation Under ACP Scheme is Conditional on No Regular Promotion Being Availed, and Refusal Disqualifies Employee as Per Condition 5.1 of Office Memorandum Dated 9.8.1999.

3 Jan 2022

The dispute involved Central Government employees appointed as Senior Translators (Hindi) who were offered promotion to Translation Officer (Hindi) bu...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)