Search Results for "mandatory period"

Trending :

High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Application Challenging Rejection of Plaint ...
Supreme Court Allows Subsidy Claim Under National Horticulture Board Scheme Due ...
Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance in Illegal Sand Mining Case Involving Wi...
Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order in Eviction Case and Remands to Trial ...
Supreme Court Quashes Charge Against Accused in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to ...

Search Results for "mandatory period"

9 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Industrial Plot Lease Forfeiture Case, Upholding UPSIDA's Cancellation Order. The forfeiture was justified due to breach of construction timelines under the lease agreement, and the High Court's refusal to interfere under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was correct as the dispute was contractual in nature.

6 Apr 2026

The appeal arose from a dispute over the forfeiture of an industrial plot lease by the Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Authority (UPSIDA). ...

High Court

High Court Refers Writ Petition to Larger Bench Due to Conflict on MRTP Act Reservation Lapsing. Dispute Involves Whether Notice Under Section 127 Served Before Plan Revision Lapses Upon Finalisation of Revised Development Plan Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

27 Mar 2026

The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by an agriculturist challenging the reservation of his land for a primary school under the Maharashtra ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Panchayat No Confidence Motion Case Due to Invalid Membership Based on Caste Certificate Non-Compliance. Member's Failure to Submit Validity Certificate Within Mandatory Period Under Section 10-1A of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 Results in Retrospective Termination of Election, Making No Confidence Motion Valid.

21 Apr 2025

The dispute centered on the validity of a No Confidence Motion against the Sarpanch of Jambulani Gram Panchayat, which hinged on whether Appellant No....

Supreme Court

Reservation Lapse Under MRTP Act: Supreme Court Declares Land Free After 33 Years of Inaction. Supreme Court Invokes Article 142 to Do Complete Justice in Land Reservation Case

25 Feb 2025

The Supreme Court held that the reservation of the land had lapsed under both Section 49(7) and Section 127 of the MRTP Act due to the failure of the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Precedent on Pension Entitlement for Job Contract Employees in Odisha. Addressing Procedural Lapses and Upholding Pension Rights – Supreme Court Intervenes Despite Delay in Appeals.

21 Feb 2025

Acts and Sections Discussed: Constitution of India, Article 14 – Equality before Law Odisha Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1992 – Rule ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Extension of Arbitral Tribunal Mandate in International Commercial Arbitration Involving Share Dispute and Insolvency Moratorium. The court extended the time for the arbitral award under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, due to a moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, which stayed proceedings and was subsequently lifted.

5 Jan 2023

The dispute arose from an international commercial arbitration between Tata Sons Pvt Ltd (applicant) and Siva Industries and Holdings Ltd (first respo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Defendant in Commercial Suit to File Written Statement Despite Expiry of 120-Day Limit Due to COVID-19 Disruptions. Time Limit Under Proviso to Order VIII Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 as Substituted by Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Extended Considering Orders in Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020 and Administrative Curtailment of Court Functioning.

14 Feb 2022

The dispute arose from a commercial suit filed by the plaintiff-respondent against the defendant-appellant for recovery of Rs. 3,73,24,821/- with inte...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Interprets Section 29A(h) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Regarding Guarantor Eligibility. The court held that a person who has executed an enforceable guarantee is not disqualified from submitting a resolution plan unless the guarantee has been invoked, as liability crystallizes upon invocation under the amended provisions.

18 Jan 2022

The Supreme Court was called upon to interpret Section 29A(h) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as amended, concerning the eligibility of a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Guarantors' Appeals in SARFAESI Act Enforcement Case, Upholding Sale of Mortgaged Properties. The Court held that multiple litigations by guarantors constitute abuse of process and cannot defeat the expeditious recovery mechanism under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.

23 Sep 2021

The Supreme Court of India dealt with civil appeals arising from special leave petitions challenging a common judgment of the Madras High Court. The d...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)