Search Results for "proof of demand"

15 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 15 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Former Gujarat Minister in Corruption Case – No Evidence of Demand or Acceptance of Bribe

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 – Sections 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) – CrPC Section 482 – Discharge Application – Prima Facie Case – Illegal Gra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Acquittal Upheld in Dowry Death Case under Section 304B IPC. Presumption under Section 113B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, not invoked due to lack of proof of demand for dowry – Acquittal by High Court affirmed by the Supreme Court.

Acquittal upheld – Supreme Court found no substantive evidence proving demand for dowry – Material contradictions in witness statements – Presum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Acquittal in Corruption Case: Demand and Acceptance of Bratification Not Proven Beyond Reasonable Doubt

Court Sets Aside Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Defective Sanction Order Demand and Acceptance of I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Upholds Acquittal in Bribery Case: Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Testimony. Court Dismisses Appeal Due to Insufficient Proof and Witness Inconsistencies.

The High Court has upheld the trial court's decision to acquit Shri Shashikant Dnyanu Jadhav, rejecting the appeal filed by the prosecution. The court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appeal by State Against Acquittal in Sudesh Patil and Manoj Waghela Corruption Case. The State of Maharashtra appeals against the acquittal of Sudesh Patil and the conviction of Manoj Waghela in a bribery case involving pension payments.

This is a judgment concerning two criminal appeals stemming from the same case. The State of Maharashtra has appealed the acquittal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Prosecution's Case Fails: Appellant Acquitted of Bribery Charges. Inconsistencies and Lack of Evidence Lead to Appellant's Acquittal in High-Profile Bribery Case

The prosecution failed to substantiate the charge under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d)(i) and (ii) of the Act against the appellant (AO1). The evidence did n...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Overturns Conviction Under Incorrect Section of Corruption Act. Appeal Allowed; Case Remanded for Correct Charges and Fresh Proceedings

The trial court convicted the accused under Section 8 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. However, the defense argued that Section 8 was incorr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Lack of Proof of Demand in Corruption Case

The importance of corroborating evidence in proving offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the  Prevention of Corruption Act. Nagpur Bench, ...