Search Results for "symbolic possession"

34 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 34 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Rent Control Eviction Case, Restoring Trial Court's Order on Unauthorized Subletting. High Court's Revisional Interference Found Impermissible as It Reappreciated Evidence Beyond Jurisdictional Limits Under Section 46 of Karnataka Rent Act, 1999.

The dispute arose from eviction proceedings initiated by the landlord against the tenant, a partnership firm, under the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Appoints Arbitrator and Grants Interim Relief in Loan Default Case Under Arbitration and SARFAESI Acts. Applicant Secures Protection for Mortgaged Property in Dispute with Respondents

The High Court of Bombay heard two connected applications filed by Tata Capital Housing Finance Limited against Inderjeet Sahni and others. The first ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Ordered Official Liquidator to Handover Possession of Tenanted Premises to the Landlords. The Court Held That Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Considered as Assets of the Company in Liquidation and Directed the Official Liquidator to Return Possession of Flats in Question.

The Court reaffirmed its wide powers under Section 446 of the Companies Act. Held that tenancy rights are not considered assets for the purpose of wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Decree for Specific Performance, Directs Execution of Possession in Favor of Appellants. Collusion Between Vendors and Respondents to Frustrate Decree Cannot Defeat the Fruits of Justice

Specific Performance and Possession – The Supreme Court held that the appellants were entitled to specific performance of the sale agreement and po...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India Ruled on the Definition of ‘Consumer’ Under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 in Loan Transactions

The Apex Court Held That a Borrower of a Project Loan Does Not Qualify as a ‘Consumer’ When the Loan is Availed for Commercial Purposes The Supre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reinstates Single Judge’s Decision in A.P. Electrical Equipment Corporation Case, Emphasizes Strict Compliance with Urban Land Ceiling Act, 1976. "Actual Physical Possession Must Be Taken Before Repeal Act, 1999; Mere Paper Possession Insufficient"

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the Division Bench’s judgment and restoring the Single Judge’s decision. The Court held...