Search Results for "unjust enrichment"

33 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 33 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Fraud Case, Reversing Dismissal of Suit for Declaration and Injunction. The court found that visible discrepancies in sale deeds and police complaint established fraud, making handwriting expert opinion not mandatory under evidence law.

The dispute arose from a suit filed by the plaintiff seeking declaration that four sale deeds executed in 2018 were null and void and not binding on h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Title Dispute Involving Multiple Previous Suits. Court Examines Maintainability Under Order 2 Rule 2 CPC and Relief Requirements Under Section 34 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 Regarding Declaration Without Consequential Possession.

The dispute originated from a property suit O.S.No.156/2010 filed by seven plaintiffs seeking declaration of title and permanent injunction regarding ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Of Land Owner Appellant, Sets Aside High Court Order Cancelling Land Acquisition Award -- No Allegations Of Collusion Or Unjust Enrichment Against Appellant -- Award Restored Under Land Acquisition (Special Railway Projects) Rules, 2016 And Railways Act, 1989

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Appellant, a land owner, challenging the High Court order which had set aside the land acquisition award...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Leave Encashment Case for Re-employed Government Servant. Re-employed Employee Entitled to Second Leave Encashment Under Rule 36 of Sikkim Government Services (Leave) Rules, 1982, as Rule 32 Creates Legal Fiction Treating Re-employment as Fresh Service Entry.

The dispute originated from the State of Sikkim's appeal against High Court orders that granted leave encashment benefits to a re-employed government ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies SEBI's Jurisdiction in Investor Compensation Claims Under Securities Law. SEBI Lacks Power to Award Direct Compensation but Can Order Disgorgement of Ill-Gotten Gains for Restitution Under Sections 11 and 11B of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.

The dispute originated in 2005 when the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) issued a show-cause notice to M/s. Vital Communications Limited ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Condones Delay, Orders Reconsideration of Refund Application for Stamp Duty.  Court Protects Citizen’s Rights Over Technicalities.

The Bombay High Court addressed a petition challenging the rejection of a refund application for stamp duty paid on a canceled development agreement. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Right to Sue in Mutual Consent Divorce Does Not Survive Death of Spouse, Rules Court" "Family Court affirms the personal nature of the right to divorce, dismisses appeal by deceased husband's family."

The case examines whether the right to sue for divorce by mutual consent under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, survives to the mother an...