High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Right to Fair Compensation—State's Duty in Land Acquisition—Constitutional Protection under Article 300A. Compulsory Acquisition—Delay in Compensation—State and Municipal Corporation Directed to Expedite Proceedings and Pay Interim Compensation...

Right to property under Article 300A includes fair compensation and a prompt acquisition process. State's failure to adhere to statutory timelines in land acquisition is unconstitutional. Compensati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Interpretation of Devasthan Regulations and Imposition of Costs Quashed. High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Tribunal’s Interpretation of Devasthan Regulations but Sets Aside Arbitrary Costs Imposed on Petitioner...

Interpretation of Article 40: The Court held that the Administrative Tribunal’s interpretation of Article 40 was sound and legally sustainable. The Court found that the amendment to Para 5 in 198...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court upheld the detention order against the Petitioner under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981, dismissing claims of non-placement of complete bail order before the detaining authority....

The Court held that non-placement of the entire bail order did not vitiate the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority since the reasoning in the bail order was limited to the completion of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Highway Authority’s Failure to Compensate for Additional Land Acquisition Deemed Unlawful – Bombay High Court. ...

Land Acquisition – Compensation – Constitutional Safeguards for Private Property Rights The High Court held that the additional land was indeed taken without legal authority and no compensation w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Decides on Automatic Reversion of Trademarks and Passing Off Claims...

Automatic Reversion of Trademarks – The High Court held that the transfer of trademarks "MANSION HOUSE" and "SAVOY CLUB" from UTO to Tilaknagar was subject to conditions under Section 31 of the Tra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Validity of Mid-Term Police Transfers Pursuant to Election Commission Directives. Bombay High Court upheld the mid-term transfers of police personnel — Directive-based transfers do not amount to deemed deputation — Public interest and administrative exigencies justified the action....

The Bombay High Court upheld the State’s authority to issue the transfers — Rejected the concept of deemed deputation — Found the transfers were valid beyond the election period. The Court rule...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Deemed Conveyance Under Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 (MOFA) — Civil Court Jurisdiction in Title Disputes — Quasi-Judicial Authority’s Scope — Premature Application for Deemed Conveyance...

Constitution of India (COI) — Article 226 — Writ Jurisdiction — Civil Court’s Exclusive Authority on Title Disputes Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay — Proxy Litigation Dismissed; License Cancellation Upheld Following Relinquishment of Tenancy Rights...

The Court held that the Deed of Release dated 10th December 2015 clearly established relinquishment of tenancy rights. No new tenancy agreement or documentation authorized continued possession.&n...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Selection Process of Managing Directors — Challenge to Introduction of Minimum Marks Benchmark — Principle of Non-Arbitrariness Upheld...

Constitution of India (COI) — Article 14 — Principle of Equality — Rules of Selection Process Cannot Be Changed Arbitrarily After Commencement — Any Change Must Meet Test of Non-Arbitrariness ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Long Incarceration and Right to Speedy Trial – Bail Granted. High Court of Judicature at Bombay emphasized the fundamental right to speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, granting bail due to prolonged incarceration....

The Court acknowledged the Applicant’s long incarceration and the fundamental right to speedy justice. It noted that the case was based on circumstantial evidence and observed the absence of any lik...