Karnataka High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Pillion Rider with Major Head Injury in Motor Vehicle Accident — Negligence of Auto Rickshaw Driver Established. The Court held that the Tribunal's award was inadequate and enhanced compensation considering 100% disability and future medical needs under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988....

The appellant, Sri Dhiraj, a pillion rider on a motorcycle, sustained severe head injuries in a road accident on 06.04.2018 when an auto rickshaw belonging to the first respondent, driven rashly and n...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows KKRTC's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Error in Multiplier Application. Compensation Reduced from Rs.1,10,36,200/- to Rs.98,10,200/- as Tribunal Applied Multiplier of 18 Instead of Correct Multiplier of 16 for Deceased Aged 30 Years Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988....

The Kalyan Karnataka Road Transport Corporation (KKRTC) appealed against the judgment and award dated 14.03.2025 passed by the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal (MACT) and I Additional Senior Civil Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition Filed by Husband Challenging Maintenance Order Under Section 19(4) of Family Courts Act, 1984 — Family Court's Assessment of Income and Needs Upheld....

The revision petition was filed by the husband under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, challenging the order dated 11.02.2025 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Belagavi in Crl.M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Partition Suit — Rejects Plaint Rejection Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Suit for Partition and Separate Possession of Joint Family Property Not Barred by Limitation as Perpetual Right to Seek Partition Recognized Under Hindu Law....

The present Regular First Appeal was filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging the judgment and decree dated 24.02.2023 passed by the IV Additional Senior Civil Jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Dishonour of Cheque Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Presumption Under Section 139 Rebutted by Accused Showing Loan Not Advanced....

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, Jagadish R, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act) for dishonour of a cheque...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Time-Barred Debt. Dishonour of Cheque Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Presumption Under Section 139 Rebutted as Loan Advanced in 2010, Cheque Issued in 2012, Debt Not Legally Enforceable....

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, Gundu Sidray Birje, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act) for dishonour of ...