All Blogs

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Partition and Separate Possession Dispute: Ancestral vs. Self-Acquired Property – High Court Upholds Joint Family Property Status...

High Court Clarifies Partition Rights in Joint Family Property, Rejects Prior Partition Claims Presumption of Joint Family Property: The Court held that in the absence of evidence of partition by met...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Deemed Dealer under MVAT Act and Prospective Effect of Tax Liability. High Court of Bombay Decides on Tax Liability of Government-Constituted Trust under Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002...

On the Issue of Deemed Dealer: The Court held that SASF was a “deemed dealer” under Section 2(8) of the MVAT Act. The Court found that SASF fell under clause (x) of the Explanation to Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Constitution of India, Code of Criminal Procedure, Indian Penal Code – Jurisdiction of High Court under Article 226 – Quashing of criminal proceedings...

High Court exercised jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution to quash criminal proceedings—Emphasis on abuse of process of law—No bar under Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Section 482...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Counter-Claim Application Filed at a Belated Stage Rejected — Application for Counter-Claim After Framing of Issues and Recording of Evidence Not Permissible — Exceptional Circumstances Not Established...

Counter-claims must generally be filed before the framing of issues; exceptional circumstances allowing later filing were absent in this case. Judicial discretion should prevent substantial alteratio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Regularization of Services, Industrial Court’s Order for Regularization of Badli Workers – Tribunal’s Affirmation – Challenge Before High Court...

Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 226 – Power of High Court in Service Matters: The High Court held that in the exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226, it was not permissible to direct reg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Marriage Certificate Under Special Marriage Act, 1954. Marriage Certificate Issued Under Special Marriage Act Is Conclusive Evidence of Legality Until Set Aside by Competent Authority...

Constitution of India, Article 226 – Writ Jurisdiction – Petition filed seeking directions for issuance of corrected Marriage Certificate after rejection of visa application by German Embassy – ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Failure to Furnish Copy of Requisition for No-Confidence Motion Does Not Invalidate the Motion: Bombay High Court. Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of No-Confidence Motion Despite Non-Service of Requisition Copy to Sarpanch...

The failure to furnish a copy of the requisition to the Sarpanch under Rule 2(2) of the No Confidence Motion Rules does not invalidate a no-confidence motion passed by a valid majority.  The provisi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Quashing of FIR and Charge Sheet in Rape Case Based on False Promise of Marriage – High Court Grants Relief to Petitioner. Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Charge Sheet Under Section 376 IPC, Citing Lack of Prima Facie Case and Ulterior Motive...

The Bombay High Court quashed the FIR and charge sheet, holding that: The allegations in the FIR, even if taken at face value, did not prima facie constitute an offence under Section 376 IPC (Par...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court’s Order of Compensation for Alleged Wrongful Confinement...

Compensation for Alleged Wrongful Detention — Scope of High Court’s Jurisdiction Under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) — Protection of Officers Under Section 69 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India Ruled on the Definition of ‘Consumer’ Under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 in Loan Transactions...

The Apex Court Held That a Borrower of a Project Loan Does Not Qualify as a ‘Consumer’ When the Loan is Availed for Commercial Purposes The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Chief Ma...