GST Audit Permissible for Period When Registration Was Active, Even If Cancelled Later. "Registered or Deregistered, Compliance Obligation Under SGST Act Persists."

Sub Category: Bombay High Court
  • 58
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

Acts and Sections Discussed:

Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (SGST Act) Section 2(13) - Definition of "audit." Section 2(94) - Definition of "registered person." Section 29(3) - Liability post-cancellation of registration. Section 65 - Audit by tax authorities. Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (GST Rules) Rule 101 - Provisions governing audit. Para-Wise Analysis with Headings 1. Introduction to the Petition [Para 1-2] The petitioner challenged notices issued under Section 65 of the SGST Act for an audit for the FY 2020-21. Primary contention: Audit provisions are inapplicable post-registration cancellation. 2. Factual Background [Para 3-6] Registration issued on 2 March 2019 and canceled on 2 May 2023 upon closure of business. Audit initiated for FY 2020-21. Petitioner relied on Tvl. Raja Stores v. AC (ST) (Madras High Court) to argue against post-cancellation audits. 3. Issues for Consideration [Para 7-9] Key Issue: Whether Section 65 audits apply to persons whose registration has been canceled. 4. Analysis of Relevant Provisions [Para 10-15] Defined "registered person" under Section 2(94) to include past registrants. An audit examines historical records, not concurrent compliance, making it relevant even post-deregistration. 5. Legislative Intent of Section 65 [Para 16-19] Rule 101 emphasizes audit applicability to financial years where registration was active. Section 65 audits are preparatory steps for recovery under Sections 73/74. 6. Submissions and Court’s Observations [Para 20-23] Petitioner’s reliance on Tvl. Raja Stores was found misplaced. The Court held that liability persists under Section 29(3), even post-cancellation. 7. Conclusion and Decision [Para 24-31] Section 65 audits remain applicable for periods when registration was active. Petition dismissed, affirming the validity of the audit notice and preliminary findings. Ratio Decidendi Definition of "Registered Person": Includes individuals registered during the period under audit, regardless of subsequent deregistration. Continuing Obligations: Cancellation of registration does not absolve compliance for earlier periods under Section 29(3). Purpose of Audit: Section 65 enables verification of historical compliance, even post-deregistration. Subjects:

GST Compliance and AuditsSGST Act, GST Audit, Registration Cancellation, Compliance Obligations, Tax Liability, Rule 101.

Issue of Consideration: LJ- Victoria Properties Private Limited Versus Union of India & Ors.

2024 LawText (BOM) (11) 190

WRIT PETITION (L) NO.34267 OF 2024

2024-11-19

M. S. Sonak & Jitendra Jain, JJ.

Mr. Mahesh Raichandani a/w Mr. Jasmine Dixit i/b UBR Legal for Petitioner. Mr. Himanshu Takke for Respondent Nos.2 and 3.

LJ- Victoria Properties Private Limited

Union of India & Ors.

Related Judgement
High Court GST Audit Permissible for Period When Registration Was Active, Even If Cancelled...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and IPC Case on Grounds of Insufficie...