A legal challenge by GATIWEB against Clause No.10 of a Maharashtra Government Resolution (GR) regarding salary disbursement in aided technical institutions. GATIWEB argues that the clause, implementing HTE-Sevarth Pranali, reduces employee salary entitlement arbitrarily. The court ultimately upholds the legality of Clause No.10, citing historical policies and the state's discretion in grant-in-aid disbursement.

1. Background and Petitioner's Argument

   • GATIWEB challenges Clause No.10 of GR dated 21.08.2015.
   • Seeks mandamus for releasing 100% salary through HTE-Sevarth Pranali.

2. Petitioner's Contention

   • Registered under Bombay Public Trust Act, representing aided technical institution employees.
   • Alleges arbitrary reduction from 100% to 90% salary without provision for the remaining 10%.

3. Government's Response

   • GRs from 1978 provide for 90% grant-in-aid subject to fund availability.
   • HTE-Sevarth Pranali aims at efficient salary disbursal without curtailing existing rights.

4. Legal Arguments

   • Interpretations of past government resolutions and policies since 1978.
   • Petitioner argues for 100% salary entitlement; respondents defend policy modernization.

5. Court's Analysis and Conclusion

   • Review of historical policies and HTE-Sevarth Pranali's impact.
   • Finds state actions lawful; dismisses arbitrariness claims.
   • Upholds legality of Clause No.10 of GR dated 21.08.2015.