The legal dispute involving a civil suit for partition and related claims, focusing on the issue of limitation under Section 9-A of the CPC. It explores conflicting court orders, the applicability of res judicata, and the impact of legislative amendments on ongoing proceedings.

1. Background and Parties Involved

   • Description of the civil suit for partition involving multiple defendants.
   • Introduction of Defendant Nos. 13 and 14 challenging the order dated 14.11.2016 on limitation grounds.

2. Arguments on Validity of Order dated 14.11.2016

   • Contention that the order deciding limitation under Section 9-A of the CPC exceeds the court's jurisdiction.
   • Discussion on conflicting interpretations of Section 9-A and its subsequent deletion by legislative amendment.

3. Res Judicata and Nullity of Order

   • Debate on whether the 14.11.2016 order can be considered res judicata.
   • Analysis of Supreme Court precedents regarding judgments rendered as nullities.

4. Legislative Amendment Impact

   • Examination of the Maharashtra State amendment deleting Section 9-A and its implications on pending cases.
   • Court's interpretation of jurisdictional issues and challenges to court orders post-amendment.

5. Court's Decision

   • Decision to quash the order dated 21.04.2023, which revisited the limitation issue.
   • Directive to expedite the ongoing trial and resolve it within six months.
   • Stay granted on the decision for parties to seek further review from a superior court.

6. Conclusion

   • The court's ruling, including the allowance of the writ petition and instructions for further proceedings.

The main legal arguments, procedural complexities, and the court's decisive actions in addressing the limitation issue within the context of the ongoing civil suit for partition.