Case Note & Summary
Acts and Sections Discussed:
Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), 1973:
Section 125: Maintenance to wife. Section 482: Inherent powers of the High Court.Hindu Marriage Act, 1955:
Section 25: Permanent alimony and maintenance. Para 1-3: Procedural Background Delay in filing and refiling the Special Leave Petition (SLP) is condoned, and leave is granted. The appellant challenges the High Court’s order dated 20.12.2019, which restored her Section 125 CrPC petition for maintenance. Para 4: Background of the Case The appellant was married to the respondent in 2006 and obtained a divorce decree on grounds of cruelty in 2016. The Supreme Court had earlier passed directions (dated 30.09.2019) for clubbing and expediting related cases before the High Court and trial court. Para 5: High Court’s Order Dated 20.12.2019 The High Court allowed the appellant’s Section 482 petition, setting aside the Family Court’s order dismissing her Section 125 CrPC petition for non-prosecution. The Section 125 CrPC petition was restored and directed to be decided on merits by the Family Court, Agra, within three months. Para 6-7: Supreme Court’s Observations The Supreme Court found no reason to interfere with the High Court’s order, as it was in favor of the appellant and restored her Section 125 petition. The Court remarked that the appellant should have appeared before the Family Court to pursue her case instead of challenging the High Court’s favorable order before the Apex Court. Para 8: Status of Other Cases Contempt petitions related to non-payment of maintenance were dismissed for non-prosecution on 24.08.2024. The First Appeal under the Hindu Marriage Act (Section 25) was decided by the High Court on 20.12.2019, directing adjudication of permanent alimony within three months. Para 9: Criticism of Lengthy Synopsis The appellant, appearing in person, filed an excessively detailed synopsis (128 pages). The Court directed the Registry to ensure litigants trim down lengthy filings, particularly for cases involving personal appearances. Para 10: Decision The civil appeal was dismissed, as the Supreme Court found no grounds to interfere with the High Court’s favorable order. Ratio Decidendi:Favorable Orders Should Not Be Challenged Without Valid Grounds:
A litigant should not seek appellate interference with orders that are favorable unless there are substantive reasons. The High Court’s order restored the petition dismissed for non-prosecution and directed expeditious adjudication.Judicial Discipline and Procedural Efficiency:
Litigants should pursue remedies before the appropriate forum (Family Court in this case) instead of escalating matters unnecessarily. Subjects:Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) – Section 125 (Maintenance of Wife)Hindu Marriage Act – Section 25 (Permanent Alimony and Maintenance)
Criminal Law Family Law Maintenance Rights Section 125 CrPC Hindu Marriage Act Section 25 Litigants in Person Procedural Fairness
Issue of Consideration: DEEPTI SHARMA VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.
Premium Content
The Issue of Consideration is only available to subscribed members.
Subscribe Now to access critical case issues
