In a case involving unauthorized electronic banking transactions, the court ruled that the bank (Respondent No. 2) must refund Rs. 76,90,017/- to Pharma Search Ayurveda Private Limited (Petitioners) as per the Reserve Bank of India Circular dated 6th July 2017. The court found that the bank failed to prove customer liability and did not notify the Petitioners of the unauthorized transactions. Consequently, the decision of Respondent No. 1, which had rejected the Petitioners' complaint, was quashed. The bank was also ordered to pay 6% interest on the refunded amount from the date of the unauthorized transactions until payment and to cover costs of Rs. 50,000/-.
Respondent No. 2 has a policy addressing unauthorized electronic banking transactions, stating customer liability based on the reporting time frame.
The court rules in favor of the Petitioners, reinforcing customer rights in cases of unauthorized transactions due to third-party breaches.
Case Title: Jaiprakash Kulkarni Ors. Versus The Banking Ombudsman Ors.
Citation: 2024 Lawtext (BOM) (6) 136
Case Number: WRIT PETITION NO.1150 OF 2023
Advocate(s): Mr. Siddhesh Bhole a/w. Yakshay Chheda, Ms. Anushree Koparkar i/b. SSB Legal & Advisory for the Petitioners. Ms. Aditi Pathak a/w. Parag Sharma, Mr. Vijay Salokhe, Ms. Kirti Ojha. Ms. Megha More i/b. BLAC & Co. for Respondent Nos.1 and 3. Ms. Anvita Ail a/w. Mr. Naresh H. Manghnani for Respondent No.2. Mr. Mohit Jadhav, Addl. G. P. for the State.
Date of Decision: 2024-06-13