Supreme Court Disposes Civil Appeal Based on Settlement Agreement Between Parties in Property Dispute. Court Modified Time Period in Settlement Agreement and Directed Drawing of Decree in Terms of Settlement, Setting Aside Impugned Judgments and Decrees.

  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court was hearing a civil appeal directed against a judgment and order dated 23.10.2008 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in AS No.1397/1994, which had set aside the judgment and decree dated 30.09.1994 passed by the II Additional Sub Court at Coimbatore in O.S. No.22/1986. During the pendency of the appeal, the parties themselves settled the matter and produced a Settlement Agreement dated 05.10.2023 along with their affidavits in I.A. No.216386/2023 dated 15.10.2023. The parties appeared before the Court through virtual mode and endorsed the factum of settlement. The Court noted that the Settlement Agreement revealed all parties had put their signatures before the Trial Court pursuant to the order of the Supreme Court dated 29.11.2023. The main legal issue before the Court was whether to dispose of the appeal based on the settlement agreement reached between the parties. The appellants argued through their Senior Counsel Ms. V. Mohana, while the respondents were represented by their counsel. The respondents submitted that the period prescribed in Clause (6) of the Settlement Agreement for handing over a 'No Objection Certificate' could be extended by two months from the date of judgment. The Court interacted with the parties and Mr. Karthik representing their side consented to granting extension of the period. The Court analyzed the settlement agreement and noted that the parties were close relatives and financial liabilities had been fulfilled in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 15.10.2023. The Court held that the impugned judgment and decree in AS No.1397/1994 and the judgment in O.S. No.22/1986 were liable to be set aside. Accordingly, the Court set aside both judgments and decrees, modified Clause (6) regarding the time period by granting extension of two months from the date of judgment, and made it clear that hereafter the parties would be bound by the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement dated 05.10.2023. The Court directed the Registry to draw a decree in terms of the Settlement Agreement and based on the judgment, and closed the execution proceedings pending before the II Additional Sub Court at Coimbatore. The civil appeal was disposed of accordingly, and all pending applications stood disposed of.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Settlement Agreements - Binding Nature and Modification - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - The Supreme Court considered a settlement agreement dated 05.10.2023 reached between parties who are close relatives, where financial liabilities had been fulfilled. The Court modified the time period in Clause (6) of the agreement, extending it by two months from the date of judgment. Held that the impugned judgments and decrees were liable to be set aside and parties would be bound by the settlement terms. (Paras 3-4)

B) Civil Procedure - Appeal Disposal - Based on Mutual Settlement - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - The Supreme Court disposed of the civil appeal after parties reached a settlement agreement during pendency of the appeal. The Court recorded the settlement, modified the time period for compliance, and directed the Registry to draw a decree in terms of the settlement agreement. Held that the appeal stands disposed of based on the settlement. (Paras 3-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeal should be disposed of based on the settlement agreement reached between the parties

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court set aside the impugned judgment and decree in AS No.1397/1994 and the judgment in O.S. No.22/1986. Modified Clause (6) of Settlement Agreement regarding time period by granting extension of two months from date of judgment. Directed Registry to draw decree in terms of Settlement Agreement dated 05.10.2023 and based on judgment. Closed execution proceedings pending before II Additional Sub Court at Coimbatore. Disposed of civil appeal.

Law Points

  • Settlement agreements in civil disputes
  • court's power to modify terms for extension of time
  • binding nature of settlement on parties
  • disposal of appeals based on mutual settlement
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (SC) (2) 18

Civil Appeal No.5184/2011

2024-02-07

C.T. Ravikumar

Ms. V. Mohana

SARASWATHI (DEAD) BY LRS. & ORS.

S.A. PALANISAMY & ORS.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal against judgment and order of High Court setting aside judgment and decree of Sub Court

Remedy Sought

Appellants seeking relief against High Court judgment

Filing Reason

Appeal against High Court judgment dated 23.10.2008 in AS No.1397/1994

Previous Decisions

II Additional Sub Court at Coimbatore passed judgment and decree dated 30.09.1994 in O.S. No.22/1986; High Court of Judicature at Madras set aside this judgment and decree through judgment and order dated 23.10.2008 in AS No.1397/1994

Issues

Whether the appeal should be disposed of based on the settlement agreement reached between the parties

Submissions/Arguments

Parties reached settlement agreement during pendency of appeal Respondents submitted that period prescribed in Clause (6) of Settlement Agreement could be extended by two months

Ratio Decidendi

When parties to a civil dispute reach a settlement agreement during pendency of appeal, the court may dispose of the appeal based on such settlement, modify terms for extension of time if necessary, set aside impugned judgments and decrees, and bind parties to the settlement terms.

Judgment Excerpts

The captioned appeal is directed against the judgment and order date 23.10.2008 in AS No.1397/1994 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras Pending the appeal, the parties themselves have settled the matter imbibing the spirit of the suggestion in that regard by this Court and produced a Settlement Agreement dated 05.10.2023 we are of the view that the impugned judgment and decree in AS No.1397/1994 and the judgment in O.S. No.22/1986 are liable to be set aside The Registry shall draw a decree in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 05.10.2023 and based on this judgment

Procedural History

II Additional Sub Court at Coimbatore passed judgment and decree dated 30.09.1994 in O.S. No.22/1986 → High Court of Judicature at Madras set aside this judgment and decree through judgment and order dated 23.10.2008 in AS No.1397/1994 → Appeal filed before Supreme Court → During pendency of appeal, parties reached settlement agreement dated 05.10.2023 → Supreme Court disposed of appeal based on settlement

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Disposes Civil Appeal Based on Settlement Agreement Between Parties in Property Dispute. Court Modified Time Period in Settlement Agreement and Directed Drawing of Decree in Terms of Settlement, Setting Aside Impugned Judgments and Decr...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Property Sale Dispute Due to Lack of Criminal Intent and Civil Nature of Allegations. The Court held that mere breach of contract does not constitute cheating under Section 415 IPC, and criminal proceedin...