Bail Granted to Accused Nos. 4 and 6 in Murder Case Following Appeal. Accused granted bail with stringent conditions after challenging the rejection of their bail applications in the murder of social worker Ramakrishna.


CASE NOTE & SUMMARY

  1. The appellants sought to set aside the rejection of their bail application.
  2. The prosecution alleged the murder of social worker Ramakrishna due to a conspiracy by the accused.
  3. The appellants argued self-defense and lack of premeditation.
  4. The prosecution emphasized the pre-planned nature of the murder and the threat to witnesses.
  5. The court found grounds to grant bail, imposing several conditions.
  6. Introduction and Appeal Details

    • Crl.A.No.2145/2023 by accused No.4 and Crl.A.No.2118/2023 by accused No.6.
    • Appeals to set aside the bail rejection order dated 17.10.2023 in Special Case No.276/2023.
  7. Prosecution's Case

    • Deceased Ramakrishna was a social worker exposing misuse of funds.
    • Accused No.1, a Panchayath Development Officer, conspired with others to kill Ramakrishna.
    • Accused Nos.2 to 6 assaulted Ramakrishna, resulting in his death.
  8. Appellants' Argument

    • Deceased was a rowdy sheeter with many enemies.
    • Incident described as a sudden fight with actions in self-defense.
    • Accused Nos.1 to 3, 5, and 7 were granted bail, some by the same court.
    • The appellants in judicial custody since 08.01.2023, not required for custodial interrogation post charge sheet filing.
  9. Prosecution's Counter-Argument

    • Ramakrishna's murder was premeditated.
    • Eye witnesses and forensic evidence support the prosecution's case.
    • Concerns over threats to witnesses if bail is granted.
  10. Court's Observations and Decision

    • Deceased initiated the conflict.
    • Postmortem report lacks evidence of injuries caused by a machete.
    • Self-defense considered, matter of conspiracy to be determined at trial.
    • Appellants' prolonged custody and completion of charge sheet filing considered.
  11. Order and Bail Conditions

    • Appeals allowed, setting aside the impugned order.
    • Bail granted to accused Nos.4 and 6 with conditions:
      • Execute a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- each with two sureties.
      • No threats to prosecution witnesses.
      • Mandatory court appearances.
      • No similar offences during the case.
      • Monthly attendance at Jagalur Police Station until case disposal.

ISSUE OF CONSIDERATION

SHRI. ARJUN @ PRASHANTH Ors. Versus STATE OF KARNATAKA Ors.

Citation: 2024 LawText (KAR) (7) 1

Case Number: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2145 OF 2023 C/W CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2118 OF 2023

Date of Decision: 2024-07-01

Case Title: SHRI. ARJUN @ PRASHANTH Ors. Versus STATE OF KARNATAKA Ors.

Before Judge: SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR J.

Appellant: SHRI. ARJUN @ PRASHANTH Ors.

Respondent: STATE OF KARNATAKA Ors.