Bail Granted to Accused Nos. 4 and 6 in Murder Case Following Appeal. Accused granted bail with stringent conditions after challenging the rejection of their bail applications in the murder of social worker Ramakrishna.
Summary of Judgement
- The appellants sought to set aside the rejection of their bail application.
- The prosecution alleged the murder of social worker Ramakrishna due to a conspiracy by the accused.
- The appellants argued self-defense and lack of premeditation.
- The prosecution emphasized the pre-planned nature of the murder and the threat to witnesses.
- The court found grounds to grant bail, imposing several conditions.
-
Introduction and Appeal Details
- Crl.A.No.2145/2023 by accused No.4 and Crl.A.No.2118/2023 by accused No.6.
- Appeals to set aside the bail rejection order dated 17.10.2023 in Special Case No.276/2023.
-
Prosecution's Case
- Deceased Ramakrishna was a social worker exposing misuse of funds.
- Accused No.1, a Panchayath Development Officer, conspired with others to kill Ramakrishna.
- Accused Nos.2 to 6 assaulted Ramakrishna, resulting in his death.
-
Appellants' Argument
- Deceased was a rowdy sheeter with many enemies.
- Incident described as a sudden fight with actions in self-defense.
- Accused Nos.1 to 3, 5, and 7 were granted bail, some by the same court.
- The appellants in judicial custody since 08.01.2023, not required for custodial interrogation post charge sheet filing.
-
Prosecution's Counter-Argument
- Ramakrishna's murder was premeditated.
- Eye witnesses and forensic evidence support the prosecution's case.
- Concerns over threats to witnesses if bail is granted.
-
Court's Observations and Decision
- Deceased initiated the conflict.
- Postmortem report lacks evidence of injuries caused by a machete.
- Self-defense considered, matter of conspiracy to be determined at trial.
- Appellants' prolonged custody and completion of charge sheet filing considered.
-
Order and Bail Conditions
- Appeals allowed, setting aside the impugned order.
- Bail granted to accused Nos.4 and 6 with conditions:
- Execute a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- each with two sureties.
- No threats to prosecution witnesses.
- Mandatory court appearances.
- No similar offences during the case.
- Monthly attendance at Jagalur Police Station until case disposal.
Case Title: SHRI. ARJUN @ PRASHANTH Ors. Versus STATE OF KARNATAKA Ors.
Citation: 2024 LawText (KAR) (7) 1
Case Number: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2145 OF 2023 C/W CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2118 OF 2023
Date of Decision: 2024-07-01