Supreme Court Allows Transfer of Divorce Petition from Karnataka to Maharashtra for Convenience of Wife. Transfer Granted Under Section 25 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Due to Wife's Hardship from Distance, Lack of Companionship, and Language Barriers in Contesting Case in Karnataka.

  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The background of the dispute involved a matrimonial conflict between a husband and wife who married in December 2020 after meeting on Facebook. The wife petitioner alleged ill-treatment and humiliation at the matrimonial home in Mangaluru, Karnataka, and was sent to Mumbai by the husband under false pretenses in January 2021. After being denied re-entry to her matrimonial home in July 2021, she lodged a police complaint and later received a divorce petition filed by the husband in the Family Court at Mangaluru. The legal issue centered on whether this divorce petition should be transferred to Mumbai for the wife's convenience. The petitioner argued that she lived with her aged parents in Mumbai, had no one to accompany her on the over 1,000 km journey, and did not know Kannada, making it difficult to contest the case in Karnataka. The respondent husband did not oppose the transfer. The court's analysis focused on the hardship faced by the wife, considering the distance, her lack of support, and language barriers, and applied principles under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, which allows for transfer of cases to avoid inconvenience. The decision was to allow the transfer petition, directing that the divorce case be moved from Mangaluru to Mumbai to facilitate the wife's participation without undue hardship.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Transfer of Cases - Convenience of Parties - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Section 25 - The petitioner wife sought transfer of a divorce petition from Mangaluru, Karnataka to Mumbai, Maharashtra citing hardship due to distance, lack of companionship, and language barriers - The court considered her circumstances including living with aged parents in Mumbai and inability to travel alone, and held that transfer was justified to avoid inconvenience (Paras 1-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the divorce petition pending before the Family Court at Mangaluru, Karnataka should be transferred to the Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai, Maharashtra for the convenience of the wife petitioner

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the transfer petition and directed that M.C. No. 331 of 2021 titled as 'Dr. Edmond Clint Fernandes vs. Mrs. Delma Lubna Coelho' pending before the Family Judge at Mangaluru, Karnataka be transferred to the Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai, Maharashtra

Law Points

  • Transfer of cases under Section 25 of Code of Civil Procedure
  • 1908
  • convenience of parties
  • hardship to wife
  • distance and language barriers
  • matrimonial disputes
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (SC) (4) 74

Transfer Petition (C) No.1475 of 2021

2023-04-18

Rajesh Bindal

DELMA LUBNA COELHO 

EDMOND CLINT FERNANDES

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Transfer petition seeking transfer of a divorce case from Karnataka to Maharashtra

Remedy Sought

Petitioner wife seeks transfer of M.C. No. 331 of 2021 from Family Judge at Mangaluru, Karnataka to Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai, Maharashtra

Filing Reason

To avoid inconvenience and hardship due to distance, lack of companionship, and language barriers in contesting the divorce petition in Karnataka

Issues

Whether the divorce petition pending before the Family Court at Mangaluru, Karnataka should be transferred to the Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai, Maharashtra for the convenience of the wife petitioner

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued she lives with old aged parents at Mumbai, has no one to accompany her to Mangaluru, does not know Kannada language, and faces hardship due to distance Respondent did not oppose the transfer

Ratio Decidendi

Transfer of cases under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 should be granted to avoid inconvenience and hardship to parties, especially in matrimonial disputes where one party faces difficulties due to distance, lack of support, and language barriers

Judgment Excerpts

The present petition has been filed by the petitioner wife seeking transfer of M.C. No. 331 of 2021 titled as 'Dr. Edmond Clint Fernandes vs. Mrs. Delma Lubna Coelho' pending before the Family Judge at Mangaluru, Karnataka to the Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai, Maharashtra. She does not even know Kannada language. Whereas the respondent will not face any problem in case the petition is transferred to Mumbai (Maharashtra).

Procedural History

Petition filed seeking transfer of divorce case; arguments presented; court considered circumstances and allowed transfer

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 25
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Transfer of Divorce Petition from Karnataka to Maharashtra for Convenience of Wife. Transfer Granted Under Section 25 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Due to Wife's Hardship from Distance, Lack of Companionship, and Language Barr...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Protection Case, Reversing NCDRC's Dismissal on Consumer Status. Overdraft Facility Availed by Stockbroker for Business Qualifies as Consumer Service Under Exception for Self-Employment Livelihood in Section 2(...