Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court's Disposal of PIL on Sabarmati Ashram Redevelopment Without Proper Adjudication. High Court Erred in Disposing of Petition Without Allowing Pleadings to be Completed and Without Adjudicating Merits.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Tushar Arun Gandhi, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Gujarat High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging a Government Resolution dated 5 March 2021 issued by the Government of Gujarat. The Resolution constituted a Governing Council and an Executive Council for the development of the Gandhi Ashram Memorial (Sabarmati Ashram), a charitable trust dedicated to preserving the writings, photos, and multimedia material of Mahatma Gandhi and Kasturba Gandhi, along with its precinct and surrounding areas. The appellant sought a direction that the redevelopment work should be spearheaded by the existing trusts running the Ashram under the auspices of the second respondent, with funding from Central and State Governments, and that the work should remain within the domain of the second to seventh respondents. The High Court, by a judgment dated 25 November 2021, disposed of the petition without allowing pleadings to be completed, holding that the petition under Article 226 was not required to be entertained in view of the submission and undertaking furnished by the Advocate General for the State of Gujarat. The undertaking recorded that the existing one-acre Gandhi Ashram on Sabarmati Riverfront would not be disturbed and would be maintained as it is, and that the project would be implemented for spreading Gandhian philosophy. The High Court dismissed the writ petition observing that the Government Order would preserve the teachings of Mahatma Gandhi. The appellant appealed to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court granted leave and allowed the appeal, holding that the High Court erred in disposing of the petition without allowing pleadings to be completed and without adjudicating the challenge on its merits. The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment and remitted the matter back to the High Court for fresh consideration in accordance with law.

Headnote

A) Public Interest Litigation - Disposal without adjudication - High Court disposed of PIL challenging Government Resolution dated 05.03.2021 regarding redevelopment of Sabarmati Ashram, based solely on Advocate General's undertaking that existing Ashram area would not be disturbed - Supreme Court held that High Court erred in not allowing pleadings to be completed and not adjudicating the challenge on merits - Appeal allowed, matter remitted back to High Court for fresh consideration (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the High Court was justified in disposing of a Public Interest Litigation challenging a Government Resolution without allowing pleadings to be completed and without adjudicating the merits, merely on the basis of an undertaking by the Advocate General.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the judgment of the Gujarat High Court dated 25 November 2021, and remitted the matter back to the High Court for fresh consideration in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Public Interest Litigation
  • Disposal without adjudication
  • Government Resolution
  • Governing Council
  • Executive Council
  • Charitable Trust
  • Sabarmati Ashram
  • Mahatma Gandhi
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 Lawtext (SC) (4) 10

Civil Appeal No 2660 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP(C) No 2181 of 2022)

2022-04-01

Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J

Tushar Arun Gandhi

State of Gujarat and Ors

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Public Interest Litigation challenging a Government Resolution constituting a Governing Council and Executive Council for development of Gandhi Ashram Memorial (Sabarmati Ashram).

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought a direction that redevelopment work should be spearheaded by existing trusts running the Ashram under the second respondent, with funding from governments, and that the work should remain within the domain of the second to seventh respondents.

Filing Reason

Challenge to Government Resolution dated 5 March 2021 regarding redevelopment of Sabarmati Ashram.

Previous Decisions

The Gujarat High Court disposed of the petition on 25 November 2021 without allowing pleadings to be completed, based on an undertaking by the Advocate General that the existing Ashram area would not be disturbed.

Issues

Whether the High Court was justified in disposing of the PIL without allowing pleadings to be completed and without adjudicating the merits.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the High Court erred in disposing of the petition without proper adjudication. The State, through the Advocate General, submitted an undertaking that the existing one-acre Ashram would not be disturbed and would be maintained as it is.

Ratio Decidendi

A High Court cannot dispose of a Public Interest Litigation challenging a Government Resolution without allowing pleadings to be completed and without adjudicating the challenge on its merits, merely on the basis of an undertaking by the Advocate General.

Judgment Excerpts

Leave granted. The appellant instituted a petition before the Gujarat High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution in the form of a Public Interest Litigation to challenge a Government Resolution dated 5 March 2021 issued by the Government of Gujarat. By a judgment dated 25 November 2021, a Division Bench of the High Court of Gujarat, disposed of the petition holding that the petition under Article 226 'is not required to be entertained' in view of the submission of and undertaking furnished by the Advocate General for the State of Gujarat.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Gujarat High Court under Article 226 challenging a Government Resolution dated 5 March 2021. The High Court disposed of the petition on 25 November 2021 without allowing pleadings to be completed, based on an undertaking by the Advocate General. The appellant appealed to the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court's Disposal of PIL on Sabarmati Ashram Redevelopment Without Proper Adjudication. High Court Erred in Disposing of Petition Without Allowing Pleadings to be Completed and Without Adjudicating Merits.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Army Offence Jurisdiction Dispute, Restoring Sessions Court Trial. Concurrent Jurisdiction Under Section 125 of Army Act, 1950 Upheld, with Commanding Officer's Discretion Exercised Through Cooperation with Civil ...