Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Ayurvedic Lecturers Seeking Absorption in Government Service — Post-Qualification Teaching Experience Requirement Upheld. Appellants lacked mandatory three years teaching experience at time of initial appointment, making them ineligible for absorption under Section 6 of Bihar Private Medical (Indian System of Medicine) College (Taking over) Act, 1985.

  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeals arose from a common grievance of five appellants who were appointed as Lecturers in private Ayurvedic colleges in Bihar between 14.03.1978 and 10.05.1979. The State of Bihar enacted the Bihar Private Medical (Indian System of Medicine) College (Taking over) Act, 1985, and took over the management of Sri Dhanwantri Ayurved College, Buxar, w.e.f. 01.06.1986. A Screening Committee was constituted to examine the eligibility of teaching and non-teaching staff for absorption into government service. The Committee, after scrutiny, recommended absorption of some employees but excluded the appellants on the ground that they did not possess the mandatory three years post-qualification teaching experience as on the date of takeover. This decision was upheld by subsequent Review Screening Committees and by the High Court in multiple rounds of litigation. The appellants challenged the final judgment of the Division Bench of the Patna High Court dated 18.09.2017 and 30.10.2017, which dismissed their writ petitions. The Supreme Court examined the qualifications prescribed under Chapter XVIB of the Bihar University Statutes and Clause 13 of the CCIM Act, 1970, which clearly required a Lecturer to have at least three years of teaching experience in a recognized Ayurvedic College. The Court noted that the appellants' initial appointments were made without this essential qualification, and therefore, they were not eligible for absorption under Section 6 of the Act, 1985. The Court held that the eligibility for absorption must be determined as on the date of takeover, and subsequent experience gained after that date could not cure the initial defect. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the High Court's judgment.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Absorption - Eligibility Criteria - Date of Takeover - The eligibility for absorption of teaching staff of a private college taken over by the State must be determined as on the date of takeover, not by subsequent experience gained later. The appellants, appointed as Lecturers between 1978-1979, did not possess the requisite three years post-qualification teaching experience as on 01.06.1986, the date of takeover under the Bihar Private Medical (Indian System of Medicine) College (Taking over) Act, 1985. Held that the Screening Committee correctly found them ineligible for absorption (Paras 3, 11, 18).

B) Service Law - Qualifications - Teaching Experience - Essential Requirement - The qualifications prescribed under Chapter XVIB of the Statutes of Bihar University and Clause 13 of the CCIM Act, 1970 mandate that a Lecturer in Ayurveda must have at least three years of teaching experience in a recognized Ayurvedic College. This is an essential qualification for appointment, and the appellants' initial appointments were invalid ab initio for want of such experience. Held that the requirement of post-qualification teaching experience cannot be waived or relaxed (Paras 14-15, 18).

C) Service Law - Absorption - Screening Committee - Validity - The Screening Committee constituted under Section 6 of the Act, 1985 examined the biodata of each teacher and found the appellants lacking the requisite teaching experience. The High Court's affirmation of the Committee's report was upheld. Held that the Committee's decision was based on objective criteria and was not arbitrary (Paras 6-11, 18).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellants, who were appointed as Lecturers in private Ayurvedic colleges prior to the takeover, were entitled to absorption in government service despite lacking the mandatory three years post-qualification teaching experience as on the date of takeover (01.06.1986).

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, holding that the appellants were not eligible for absorption as they did not possess the mandatory three years post-qualification teaching experience as on the date of takeover (01.06.1986). The impugned judgments of the High Court were affirmed.

Law Points

  • Absorption of employees under a taking-over statute requires fulfillment of eligibility criteria as on the date of takeover
  • not subsequent regularization
  • qualifications prescribed by CCIM Act
  • 1970 and University Statutes for teaching staff are mandatory
  • post-qualification teaching experience is an essential qualification for appointment as Lecturer in Ayurvedic colleges.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (SC) (4) 22

Civil Appeal No(s). 2943 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP(C) No.10473 of 2018) with Civil Appeal No(s). of 2022 (Arising out of SLP(C) No.11057 of 2018)

2022-03-21

Rastogi, J.

Harish Chandra Shrivastava and others

The State of Bihar and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeals against the judgment of the Patna High Court dismissing writ petitions challenging the termination of services and non-absorption of the appellants as teaching staff in Ayurvedic colleges taken over by the State.

Remedy Sought

The appellants sought absorption into government service as Lecturers/Readers/Professors in the taken-over Ayurvedic college, challenging the Screening Committee's report and the termination order.

Filing Reason

The appellants were appointed as Lecturers in private Ayurvedic colleges between 1978-1979 but were not absorbed into government service after the takeover because they lacked the mandatory three years post-qualification teaching experience as on the date of takeover (01.06.1986).

Previous Decisions

The High Court had earlier directed constitution of a fresh Screening Committee, which again found the appellants ineligible. The Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the appellants' writ petitions on 18.09.2017 and 30.10.2017, leading to the present appeals.

Issues

Whether the appellants were entitled to absorption in government service despite lacking the mandatory three years post-qualification teaching experience as on the date of takeover? Whether the requirement of teaching experience under the University Statutes and CCIM Act, 1970 is an essential qualification for appointment as Lecturer?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that they had acquired the requisite teaching experience over the years and should be considered for absorption based on their long service. Respondent State argued that the eligibility for absorption must be determined as on the date of takeover, and the appellants did not meet the essential qualification of three years post-qualification teaching experience at that time.

Ratio Decidendi

The eligibility for absorption of teaching staff of a private college taken over by the State must be determined as on the date of takeover. The requirement of three years post-qualification teaching experience for the post of Lecturer, as prescribed under Chapter XVIB of the Bihar University Statutes and Clause 13 of the CCIM Act, 1970, is an essential qualification. Appellants who did not possess this qualification at the time of their initial appointment or as on the date of takeover cannot be absorbed, and subsequent experience cannot cure the initial defect.

Judgment Excerpts

Admittedly, their appointment as a Lecturer was much prior to 25th March, 1984. The State Government in exercise of its power under Section 3 of the Act 1985 took over the management of Sri Dhanwantri Ayurved College... w.e.f. 1st June, 1986. Qualifications: Degree in Ayurveda from a University... with at least 3 years of teaching experience in a recognized Ayurvedic College... Teaching experience in any institution for ten years, five years and three years for the post of Professor, Reader and Lecturer respectively.

Procedural History

The appellants were appointed as Lecturers in private Ayurvedic colleges between 1978-1979. The State took over the college w.e.f. 01.06.1986 under the Act, 1985. A Screening Committee recommended absorption of some employees but excluded the appellants. The High Court directed a fresh Screening Committee, which again found the appellants ineligible. The State issued termination orders on 29.08.2003. The appellants challenged the termination and non-absorption in writ petitions, which were dismissed by the Division Bench of the Patna High Court on 18.09.2017 and 30.10.2017. The appellants then filed special leave petitions, which were converted into civil appeals and dismissed by the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Bihar Private Medical (Indian System of Medicine) College (Taking over) Act, 1985: 3, 6
  • Central Council of Indian Indigenous Act, 1970: 13
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Ayurvedic Lecturers Seeking Absorption in Government Service — Post-Qualification Teaching Experience Requirement Upheld. Appellants lacked mandatory three years teaching experience at time of initial appointment,...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Service Law Case Over Resignation and Pension Benefits. Withdrawn Resignation Before Acceptance is Ineffective, and State Cannot Pass Successive Adverse Orders After Judicial Finality, Entitling Appellant to Pension Bas...