Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Exclusive Voting Rights for Scheduled Tribes in Scheduled Areas. Representation of the People Act and Delimitation Act Apply to Scheduled Areas Without Specific Notification Under Fifth Schedule.

  • 16
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Orissa challenging the application of the Representation of the People Act, 1950 and the Delimitation Act, 2002 to the Sundargarh Scheduled Area in Orissa. The appellant contended that under Clause 5(1) of the Fifth Schedule to the Constitution, no Central or State law applies to a Scheduled Area unless the Governor issues a specific notification to that effect. Since no such notification was issued for the 1950 Act and the 2002 Act, they argued that these laws were inapplicable. Consequently, they sought a declaration that only Scheduled Tribe members could reside, vote, and contest elections in the Scheduled Area, and that all constituencies should be reserved for Scheduled Tribes under Articles 330 and 332. The High Court dismissed the petition. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined the scope of Clause 5(1) of the Fifth Schedule. The Court held that Clause 5(1) applies only to laws made by the State Legislature, not to laws made by Parliament. The Representation of the People Act, 1950 and the Delimitation Act, 2002 are Central laws enacted by Parliament, and therefore they apply to Scheduled Areas without any requirement of a Governor's notification. The Court further held that the right to vote under Article 326 is a constitutional right available to all citizens, and non-tribals residing in Scheduled Areas are entitled to vote and contest elections. The Fifth Schedule does not create an exclusive zone for Scheduled Tribes. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's judgment.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Fifth Schedule - Applicability of Laws to Scheduled Areas - Clause 5(1) of Fifth Schedule - The provision requiring notification by Governor for application of laws to Scheduled Areas applies only to laws made by the State Legislature, not to laws made by Parliament. Therefore, the Representation of the People Act, 1950 and the Delimitation Act, 2002, being Central laws, apply to Scheduled Areas without any specific notification. (Paras 1-3)

B) Election Law - Right to Vote - Scheduled Areas - Articles 326, 330, 332 of Constitution - The right to vote is conferred by Article 326 on all citizens of India, irrespective of caste or tribe. Non-tribals residing in a Scheduled Area are entitled to vote and contest elections. The Constitution does not create exclusive voting rights for Scheduled Tribes in Scheduled Areas. (Paras 1-3)

C) Constitutional Law - Fifth Schedule - Purpose - Protection of Tribal Interests - The Fifth Schedule is intended to protect tribal interests through special regulations, but it does not exclude non-tribals from residing, voting, or contesting elections in Scheduled Areas. The provisions of the Representation of the People Act and Delimitation Act are not inconsistent with the Fifth Schedule. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Representation of the People Act, 1950 and the Delimitation Act, 2002 require a specific notification under Clause 5(1) of the Fifth Schedule to apply to a Scheduled Area, and whether non-tribals residing in a Scheduled Area are disentitled to vote or contest elections.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the Representation of the People Act, 1950 and the Delimitation Act, 2002 apply to Scheduled Areas without any specific notification under Clause 5(1) of the Fifth Schedule, as that clause applies only to State laws. Non-tribals have the right to vote and contest elections in Scheduled Areas.

Law Points

  • Fifth Schedule
  • Clause 5(1) does not require specific notification for laws of Parliament to apply to Scheduled Areas
  • Representation of the People Act
  • 1950 and Delimitation Act
  • 2002 apply to Scheduled Areas
  • Right to vote is a constitutional right under Article 326
  • not dependent on tribal status
  • Scheduled Areas are not exclusive zones for Scheduled Tribes.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (SC) (5) 68

Civil Appeal No. 2202 of 2012

2023-05-10

Abhay S. Oka, J.

Adivasis for Social and Human Rights Action

Union of India & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal against dismissal of writ petition challenging applicability of election laws to Scheduled Area.

Remedy Sought

Declaration that only Scheduled Tribe members can reside, vote, and contest elections in the Scheduled Area, and that all constituencies should be reserved for Scheduled Tribes.

Filing Reason

Appellant contended that Central laws do not apply to Scheduled Area without Governor's notification under Fifth Schedule.

Previous Decisions

High Court of Orissa dismissed the writ petition.

Issues

Whether the Representation of the People Act, 1950 and the Delimitation Act, 2002 require a specific notification under Clause 5(1) of the Fifth Schedule to apply to a Scheduled Area. Whether non-tribals residing in a Scheduled Area are disentitled to vote or contest elections.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that under Clause 5(1) of the Fifth Schedule, no Central or State law applies to a Scheduled Area without a Governor's notification, and since no such notification was issued for the 1950 Act and 2002 Act, they are inapplicable. Appellant argued that only Scheduled Tribe members should have the right to reside, vote, and contest elections in the Scheduled Area.

Ratio Decidendi

Clause 5(1) of the Fifth Schedule applies only to laws made by the State Legislature, not to laws made by Parliament. Therefore, Central laws like the Representation of the People Act, 1950 and the Delimitation Act, 2002 apply to Scheduled Areas without any requirement of a Governor's notification. The right to vote under Article 326 is a constitutional right available to all citizens, and non-tribals are entitled to vote and contest elections in Scheduled Areas.

Judgment Excerpts

In exercise of powers under subclause (2) of Clause 6 of the Fifth Schedule to the Constitution of India, on 31st December 1977, the Hon’ble President of India declared the entire District of Sundargarh in the State of Orissa as a Scheduled Area. The first contention raised in the writ petition was that in the Scheduled Area, except for the members of the Scheduled Tribes, no one has the right to settle down. Another contention raised in the petition is that in view of subclause (1) of Clause 5 of the Fifth Schedule unless there is a specific notification issued by the Hon’ble Governor of the State applying any particular Central or State law to a Scheduled Area, none of the provisions of the Central or State laws are applicable to that particular Scheduled Area.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a writ petition under Article 226 before the High Court of Orissa, which was dismissed by a Division Bench. The appellant then appealed to the Supreme Court, which granted leave on 14th February 2012 and heard the appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Fifth Schedule, Clause 5(1), Clause 6(2), Articles 226, 326, 330, 332
  • Representation of the People Act, 1950:
  • Delimitation Act, 2002:
  • Societies Registration Act, 1860:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Exclusive Voting Rights for Scheduled Tribes in Scheduled Areas. Representation of the People Act and Delimitation Act Apply to Scheduled Areas Without Specific Notification Under Fifth Schedule.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Inadmissibility of Confessional Statements Recorded by Officers Empowered Under Section 53 of NDPS Act. Confessional statement recorded under Section 67 of NDPS Act by an officer invested with powers ...