Supreme Court Allows Review Petitions in Art & Craft Teacher Recruitment Dispute, Holds Equivalence of Qualifications is a Matter for the State to Determine. The court set aside its earlier judgment and restored the High Court's order recognizing the Kurukshetra University Diploma as equivalent.

  • 23
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case pertains to a long-standing recruitment process initiated in 2006 for 816 posts of Art & Craft Teachers in Haryana. The eligibility criteria required a 2-year Diploma in Art & Craft from the Haryana Industrial Training Department or an equivalent qualification recognized by the Haryana Education Department. The Director, School Education, issued a letter on 12.12.2006 stating that only the Diploma from the Industrial Training Department was recognized, excluding Diplomas from Kurukshetra University. This was challenged in the Punjab & Haryana High Court, which on 22.02.2007 held that the Kurukshetra University Diploma had been recognized by the State in 1999 and quashed the letter. However, the Supreme Court, in Civil Appeal No. 7031 of 2021, reversed this decision on 24.11.2021, holding that equivalence of qualifications is a matter for the State to determine. Subsequently, review petitions were filed by 404 candidates who held Kurukshetra University Diplomas. The Supreme Court granted the review petitions, noting that the earlier judgment had not considered the 1999 recognition. The court also noted that a fresh selection list had been prepared, but appointments were withheld pending the review. The court directed that the selection process be completed within three months, subject to the outcome of the review. The review petitions were allowed, and the judgment dated 24.11.2021 was set aside, restoring the High Court's order dated 22.02.2007.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Recruitment - Equivalence of Qualifications - The court held that the determination of equivalence of qualifications is a matter for the State, as the recruiting authority, and not for the courts to decide. The High Court had erred in holding that the Diploma in Art & Craft of Kurukshetra University was equivalent to that of the Haryana Industrial Training Department. (Paras 1-2)

B) Service Law - Review Petition - Error Apparent on Record - The Supreme Court allowed the review petitions, finding that the earlier judgment dated 24.11.2021 had not considered the fact that the State had recognized the Kurukshetra University Diploma in 1999. The review was granted to correct this error. (Paras 2, 5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Diploma in Art & Craft from Kurukshetra University is equivalent to the Diploma in Art & Craft from the Haryana Industrial Training Department for the purpose of appointment as Art & Craft Teacher in Haryana

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the review petitions, set aside the judgment dated 24.11.2021, and restored the order of the Punjab & Haryana High Court dated 22.02.2007. The court directed that the selection process be completed within three months.

Law Points

  • Equivalence of qualifications is a matter for the recruiting authority to determine
  • Recognition of qualifications by the State is essential for appointment
  • Review petitions can be allowed when there is an error apparent on the face of the record
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (SC) (7) 4

Review Petition (C) No. 154 of 2022 in Civil Appeal No. 7031 of 2021 (@ Special Leave Petition (C) No. 8670 of 2007)

2023-07-03

Sanjay Kumar

Neeraj Kumar & Anr.

State of Haryana & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Review petitions against the Supreme Court's judgment dated 24.11.2021 in a service matter concerning recruitment of Art & Craft Teachers.

Remedy Sought

Review of the judgment dated 24.11.2021 and restoration of the High Court's order dated 22.02.2007.

Filing Reason

The review petitioners, who held Diplomas in Art & Craft from Kurukshetra University, were aggrieved by the Supreme Court's finding that their qualification was not equivalent to the Diploma from the Haryana Industrial Training Department.

Previous Decisions

The Punjab & Haryana High Court on 22.02.2007 held that the Kurukshetra University Diploma was recognized. The Supreme Court on 24.11.2021 reversed this, holding equivalence is for the State to determine. The selection process was quashed and a fresh selection was held, resulting in a list dated 14.11.2021.

Issues

Whether the Diploma in Art & Craft from Kurukshetra University is equivalent to the Diploma from the Haryana Industrial Training Department for appointment as Art & Craft Teacher. Whether the Supreme Court's judgment dated 24.11.2021 suffered from an error apparent on the face of the record.

Submissions/Arguments

The review petitioners argued that the Kurukshetra University Diploma had been recognized by the State of Haryana in 1999, which was not considered in the earlier judgment. The respondents argued that equivalence of qualifications is a matter for the State to determine and that the earlier judgment was correct.

Ratio Decidendi

The determination of equivalence of qualifications is a matter for the State, as the recruiting authority, and not for the courts. However, in this case, the State had already recognized the Kurukshetra University Diploma in 1999, and the earlier judgment had overlooked this fact, warranting review.

Judgment Excerpts

A recruitment process initiated in the year 2006 is still hanging fire. This Court held that equivalence of qualifications is a matter for the State, as the recruiting authority, to determine. The review petitioners, 404 in all, secured Diplomas in Art & Craft from Kurukshetra University and are aggrieved by the finding of non-equivalence of their qualification.

Procedural History

The recruitment process began in 2006. The High Court allowed a writ petition on 22.02.2007. The Supreme Court allowed an appeal on 24.11.2021, setting aside the High Court's order. Review petitions were filed in 2022. The Supreme Court granted review and reheard the matter, ultimately allowing the review petitions.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Review Petitions in Art & Craft Teacher Recruitment Dispute, Holds Equivalence of Qualifications is a Matter for the State to Determine. The court set aside its earlier judgment and restored the High Court's order recognizing the...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Mortgage Redemption Case — Mortgage Extinguished by Act of Parties Under Section 60 TP Act. The right to redeem was extinguished when the mortgagee assignee received the mortgage amount and delivered possession to ...