Court Dismisses Writ Petitions, Affirms Existence of Industrial Dispute for Adjudication. Labour Court to Decide Merits of Long-Standing Termination Dispute Despite Delays

Sub Category: Bombay High Court
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a dispute between the Petitioner, who terminated the Respondents' services, and the Respondents, who claimed illegal termination and raised an industrial dispute. The Petitioner challenged the order of Reference made by the appropriate Government, citing delays and the absence of an existing industrial dispute. The court reviewed arguments from both parties, the legislative framework under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and relevant judicial precedents. The court concluded that an industrial dispute existed when the Reference was made and dismissed the Writ Petitions, allowing the Labour Court to adjudicate the matter on its merits.

Introduction Rule Made Returnable Forthwith Respondents waived service. Background Respondents' Termination and Demand Termination of Respondents' services led to an industrial Reference. Petitioner's Manufacturing Plant Closure Plant closure and retrenchment notices issued in 2001. Legal Proceedings

Unfair Labour Practices Complaint

Industrial Court found Petitioner engaged in unfair labour practices.

Petitioner's Application and Respondents' Demand

Petitioner applied for No Objection in 2015; Respondents raised demands.

Conciliation and Reference to Labour Court

Failure report led to Reference for adjudication.

Petition to Quash Reference

Petitioner sought to quash the Reference order. Arguments Hearing of Counsel Arguments presented by both parties and Government Pleader. Petitioner's Contentions Delay and Non-Existence of Industrial Dispute Claims raised by Petitioner regarding delay and lack of existing dispute. Respondents' Defense Existence of Industrial Dispute Respondents contended the dispute still existed and should be decided by Labour Court. Judicial Considerations

Rival Contentions

Consideration of arguments from both sides.

Legislative Framework

Provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 explained.

No Limitation Period for Reference

Judicial precedents on delay and existence of industrial dispute.

Supreme Court Decisions

Summary of relevant Supreme Court rulings. Analysis

Legislative Intent and Industrial Dispute Settlement

Interpretation of Act to advance legislative intent.

Existence of Industrial Dispute

Examination of whether a dispute existed at the time of Reference.

Merits of Respondents' Case

Understanding Respondents' arguments based on the notice and plant transfer.

Respondents' Affidavit

Affidavit and Industrial Court judgment provided by Respondents.

Respondents' Case Summary

Detailed summary of Respondents' case and history.

Petitioner's Notice and Promise

Notice indicating possible plant restart considered by Respondents.

Different Factual Situation

Differentiation from other cases cited by Petitioner.

Industrial Dispute Existence

Confirmation that a dispute existed when the Reference was made.

No Prejudice to Petitioner

No demonstrated prejudice to Petitioner.

Merits to be Decided by Labour Court

Arguments to be presented before Labour Court. Conclusion

Industrial Peace and Balance

Importance of balancing interests to maintain industrial peace.

No Interference with Reference Order

Decision that no interference is warranted with the Reference order.

Dismissal of Writ Petitions

Writ Petitions dismissed with no order as to costs.

Issue of Consideration: M/s. Bhor Industries Ltd. Ors. Versus Vitthal Sahebrao Kumbhar Ors.

2024 LawText (BOM) (7) 188

WRIT PETITION NO. 6241 OF 2017 WITH 6237 OF 2017 , 7183 OF 2017 , 6243 OF 2017 , 6248 OF 2017 , 6251 OF 2017 , 6236 OF 2017 , 6239 OF 2017 , 6245 OF 2017 , 5999 OF 2017 , 6238 OF 2017 , 6008 OF 2017 , 7184 OF 2017 , 5998 OF 2017 , 6007 OF 2017 , 7187 OF 2017 , 6256 OF 2017 , 6253 OF 2017 , 7192 OF 2017 , 6250 OF 2017 , 6244 OF 2017 , 7182 OF 2017 , 6247 OF 2017 , 6257 OF 2017 , 7190 OF 2017 , 7191 OF 2017 , 7188 OF 2017 , 7186 OF 2017 , 4676 OF 2018 , 6249 OF 2017 , 6255 OF 2017 , 4895 OF 2017 , 7194 OF 2017 , 7193 OF 2017 , 4690 OF 2018 , 4689 OF 2018 , 4692 OF 2017

2024-07-18

NITIN JAMDAR, AND M.M. SATHAYE, J.J.

M/s. Bhor Industries Ltd. Ors.

Vitthal Sahebrao Kumbhar Ors.

Related Judgement
High Court Court Dismisses Writ Petitions, Affirms Existence of Industrial Dispute for Adju...
Related Judgement
High Court Court Allows Student to Complete Commerce Degree Despite Eligibility Dispute. Mu...