Case Note & Summary
The case involves a dispute between the Petitioner, who terminated the Respondents' services, and the Respondents, who claimed illegal termination and raised an industrial dispute. The Petitioner challenged the order of Reference made by the appropriate Government, citing delays and the absence of an existing industrial dispute. The court reviewed arguments from both parties, the legislative framework under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and relevant judicial precedents. The court concluded that an industrial dispute existed when the Reference was made and dismissed the Writ Petitions, allowing the Labour Court to adjudicate the matter on its merits.
Introduction Rule Made Returnable Forthwith Respondents waived service. Background Respondents' Termination and Demand Termination of Respondents' services led to an industrial Reference. Petitioner's Manufacturing Plant Closure Plant closure and retrenchment notices issued in 2001. Legal ProceedingsUnfair Labour Practices Complaint
Industrial Court found Petitioner engaged in unfair labour practices.Petitioner's Application and Respondents' Demand
Petitioner applied for No Objection in 2015; Respondents raised demands.Conciliation and Reference to Labour Court
Failure report led to Reference for adjudication.Petition to Quash Reference
Petitioner sought to quash the Reference order. Arguments Hearing of Counsel Arguments presented by both parties and Government Pleader. Petitioner's Contentions Delay and Non-Existence of Industrial Dispute Claims raised by Petitioner regarding delay and lack of existing dispute. Respondents' Defense Existence of Industrial Dispute Respondents contended the dispute still existed and should be decided by Labour Court. Judicial ConsiderationsRival Contentions
Consideration of arguments from both sides.Legislative Framework
Provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 explained.No Limitation Period for Reference
Judicial precedents on delay and existence of industrial dispute.Supreme Court Decisions
Summary of relevant Supreme Court rulings. AnalysisLegislative Intent and Industrial Dispute Settlement
Interpretation of Act to advance legislative intent.Existence of Industrial Dispute
Examination of whether a dispute existed at the time of Reference.Merits of Respondents' Case
Understanding Respondents' arguments based on the notice and plant transfer.Respondents' Affidavit
Affidavit and Industrial Court judgment provided by Respondents.Respondents' Case Summary
Detailed summary of Respondents' case and history.Petitioner's Notice and Promise
Notice indicating possible plant restart considered by Respondents.Different Factual Situation
Differentiation from other cases cited by Petitioner.Industrial Dispute Existence
Confirmation that a dispute existed when the Reference was made.No Prejudice to Petitioner
No demonstrated prejudice to Petitioner.Merits to be Decided by Labour Court
Arguments to be presented before Labour Court. ConclusionIndustrial Peace and Balance
Importance of balancing interests to maintain industrial peace.No Interference with Reference Order
Decision that no interference is warranted with the Reference order.Dismissal of Writ Petitions
Writ Petitions dismissed with no order as to costs.
Issue of Consideration: M/s. Bhor Industries Ltd. Ors. Versus Vitthal Sahebrao Kumbhar Ors.
Premium Content
The Issue of Consideration is only available to subscribed members.
Subscribe Now to access critical case issues


