Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder and Cruelty Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration. The Court upheld the acquittal of the accused under Sections 498A and 302/34 IPC, finding the dying declaration inconsistent and lacking proper certification of fitness of mind, and declined to interfere with concurrent findings under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.

  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a criminal appeal filed by the brother of the deceased challenging the acquittal of the deceased's sister-in-law and husband for charges under Sections 498A and 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, which was affirmed by the High Court. The deceased suffered 95% burn injuries at her matrimonial home on 17 September 1991 and died the next day, with no eyewitnesses; the prosecution case relied solely on circumstantial evidence based on her dying declarations. The core legal issues were whether the dying declaration was admissible and reliable under Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and whether the Supreme Court should interfere with the concurrent acquittal under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The appellant argued that the deceased was conscious and in a fit state of mind when making the declarations, citing medical records and witness testimonies, while the respondents contended that the declarations were inconsistent, lacked proper certification of fitness, and suggested suicide due to the deceased's frustration over infertility and suspicions of an illicit affair. The Court analyzed the evidence, noting contradictions in the statements—initially blaming the husband, then the sister-in-law—and the absence of a doctor's endorsement regarding the deceased's fitness of mind, distinguishing between consciousness and fitness as per precedent. It reiterated the principle that a dying declaration must inspire confidence and be free from doubt, and in cases of suspicion, the benefit of doubt goes to the accused. Regarding appellate jurisdiction, the Court held that interference with concurrent acquittal is warranted only in cases of manifest illegality or perversity, which was not present here as the lower courts' view was reasonably possible. The decision dismissed the appeal, upholding the acquittal and favoring the accused, based on the unreliability of the dying declaration and the absence of grounds for Supreme Court intervention.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Dying Declaration - Admissibility and Reliability - Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Section 32 - The deceased suffered 95% burn injuries and made multiple statements blaming her husband and sister-in-law, but the dying declaration lacked a doctor's certification of fitness of mind and contained contradictions - The Court held that a dying declaration alone can form the basis for conviction if voluntary and inspiring confidence, but here it was suspect due to variations and absence of fitness certification, warranting benefit of doubt to the accused (Paras 9-12).

B) Criminal Procedure - Appeal Against Acquittal - Interference by Supreme Court - Constitution of India, Article 136 - The appellant challenged the concurrent acquittal by the trial court and High Court under Sections 498A and 302/34 IPC - The Court emphasized that under Article 136, it does not ordinarily interfere with concurrent findings of fact unless there is manifest illegality, perversity, or miscarriage of justice, and the view taken by the lower courts was reasonably possible - Held that no interference was warranted as the dying declaration was not reliably proved (Paras 6-7).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the dying declaration of the deceased was reliable and whether the concurrent acquittal of the respondents under Sections 498A and 302/34 IPC should be interfered with by the Supreme Court under Article 136 of the Constitution of India

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the acquittal of the respondents under Sections 498A and 302/34 IPC, finding no grounds to interfere with the concurrent findings as the dying declaration was unreliable and the view taken by the lower courts was reasonably possible

Law Points

  • Dying declaration admissibility under Section 32 Indian Evidence Act
  • 1872
  • standard for interference with concurrent acquittal under Article 136 Constitution of India
  • distinction between consciousness and fitness of mind for dying declaration
  • benefit of doubt to accused in circumstantial evidence cases
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (SC) (3) 93

Criminal Appeal No. 35 of 2013

2021-03-25

Navin Sinha, J.

Shri Rajendra Singhvi, Shri Ramesh Gupta

Naresh Kumar

Kalawati and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against acquittal in a murder and cruelty case

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to challenge the acquittal of the respondents under Sections 498A and 302/34 IPC

Filing Reason

The appellant, brother of the deceased, was dissatisfied with the acquittal affirmed by the High Court

Previous Decisions

The trial court and High Court had acquitted the respondents, holding the dying declaration was not proved in accordance with law and did not inspire confidence

Issues

Whether the dying declaration of the deceased was reliable under Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Whether the Supreme Court should interfere with the concurrent acquittal under Article 136 of the Constitution of India

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued the deceased was conscious and in a fit state of mind, and the dying declaration should be accepted despite lack of doctor's endorsement The respondents argued the dying declaration was inconsistent, lacked certification of fitness, and suggested suicide, and the concurrent acquittal should not be interfered with

Ratio Decidendi

A dying declaration under Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, must inspire confidence and be free from doubt; if suspect, the benefit of doubt goes to the accused. The Supreme Court under Article 136 of the Constitution of India does not ordinarily interfere with concurrent acquittals unless there is manifest illegality or perversity.

Judgment Excerpts

The deceased suffered 95% burn injuries on 17.09.1991 at about 4:30 pm and succumbed in the hospital the next day A dying declaration is admissible in evidence under Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 If the view taken by two courts is a reasonably possible view, this Court would be reluctant to interfere with a concurrent order of acquittal

Procedural History

The respondents were acquitted by the trial court under Sections 498A and 302/34 IPC; the High Court affirmed the acquittal; the appellant filed a criminal appeal in the Supreme Court challenging the acquittal

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 498A, 302/34
  • Indian Evidence Act, 1872: 32
  • Constitution of India: Article 136
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder and Cruelty Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration. The Court upheld the acquittal of the accused under Sections 498A and 302/34 IPC, finding the dying declaration inconsistent and lacking ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in SC & ST Act and IPC Rape Case Involving Blind Scheduled Caste Victim. The Court affirmed that the offence under Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities)...