Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant in Civil Appeal Against NCLAT Order Due to Lack of Reason for Interference. Civil Appeal Challenging Tribunal Order is Dismissed as Court Finds No Ground to Overturn Impugned Decision.

  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court of India, in its civil appellate jurisdiction, considered a civil appeal challenging an order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi. The appellant, Gulabchand Jain, filed the appeal against the respondent, Ramchandra D. Choudhary. The court allowed an impleadment application (I.A.No.114387/2021) as part of the proceedings. The core legal issue before the court was whether to interfere with the impugned order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal. The appellant's counsel presented arguments seeking intervention, but the court, after hearing these submissions, concluded that there was no justification to overturn the tribunal's decision. The court's analysis was succinct, focusing on the principle of non-interference with tribunal orders unless compelling reasons exist. No specific statutory provisions or precedents were cited in the judgment text. The court dismissed the civil appeal, thereby upholding the order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal. All pending applications were disposed of as a consequence of this dismissal.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Appellate Jurisdiction - Non-interference with Tribunal Orders - Supreme Court Rules - The Supreme Court heard counsel for the appellant and found no reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal - Held that the Civil Appeal is dismissed accordingly (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether to interfere with the order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Civil Appeal is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

Law Points

  • Appellate jurisdiction
  • Non-interference with tribunal orders
  • Dismissal of civil appeal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (SC) (9) 63

Civil Appeal No. 5640 of 2021

2021-09-17

Ajay Rastogi, Abhay S. Oka

Gulabchand Jain

Ramchandra D. Choudhary

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal challenging an order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal

Remedy Sought

Appellant seeking interference with the impugned order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal

Filing Reason

Appellant dissatisfied with the order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal

Previous Decisions

Order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi

Issues

Whether to interfere with the order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court found no reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, leading to the dismissal of the civil appeal.

Judgment Excerpts

We heard counsel for the appellant and find no reason to interfere with the order impugned passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi. The Civil Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.

Procedural History

Civil Appeal No. 5640 of 2021 filed in the Supreme Court of India. I.A.No.114387/2021 for impleadment was allowed. The appeal was heard and dismissed on September 17, 2021.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant in Civil Appeal Against NCLAT Order Due to Lack of Reason for Interference. Civil Appeal Challenging Tribunal Order is Dismissed as Court Finds No Ground to Overturn Impugned Decision.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Benami Property Dispute Under Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Act, 1988. Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Property Was Held for Benefit of Hindu Undivided Family Coparceners Under Section 4(3)(a), Making Suit Barred Under...