Supreme Court Allows Transfer Petition in Divorce Case Under Section 25 CPC. Wife's Request for Transfer of Proceedings from Rajasthan to Uttar Pradesh Granted Based on Facts and Circumstances.

  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court of India heard a transfer petition filed under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The petitioner-wife sought transfer of Divorce Petition No. 10/2017, filed by the respondent-husband in the Court of Additional District & Session Judge, Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan, to a competent court at Ghazipur, Uttar Pradesh. The court considered the facts, circumstances, and material on record. After hearing learned counsel for both sides and perusing the record, the court found the prayer for transfer justified. Consequently, the court ordered the transfer of the divorce petition from Rajasthan to Ghazipur, Uttar Pradesh. The Additional District and Sessions Court at Rajasthan was directed to transmit the entire record to the transferee court immediately. The transferee court was instructed to decide the case expeditiously. The Registry was directed to send copies of the order to both courts by email for compliance. The transfer petition was allowed accordingly.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Transfer of Proceedings - Section 25 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - The Supreme Court allowed a transfer petition filed by the wife seeking transfer of divorce proceedings from Rajasthan to Uttar Pradesh - Held that considering facts and circumstances, the transfer was justified to ensure convenience and expeditious disposal (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the divorce petition filed by the husband in Rajasthan should be transferred to Ghazipur, UP at the wife's request

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Transfer petition allowed. Divorce Petition No. 10/2017 transferred from Court of Additional District & Session Judge, Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan to competent court at Ghazipur, UP. Rajasthan court directed to transmit entire record immediately. Transferee court to decide case expeditiously.

Law Points

  • Transfer of proceedings under Section 25 CPC
  • convenience of parties
  • expeditious disposal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (SC) (11) 5

Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 113 of 2018

2021-11-22

B.V. Nagarathna

Jyoti Jaiswal

Neeraj Kumar Gupta

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Transfer petition seeking transfer of divorce proceedings

Remedy Sought

Petitioner-wife seeking transfer of Divorce Petition No. 10/2017 from Rajasthan to Ghazipur, UP

Filing Reason

To transfer divorce petition filed by husband in Rajasthan to wife's location in Uttar Pradesh

Issues

Whether the divorce petition should be transferred from Rajasthan to Uttar Pradesh

Ratio Decidendi

Transfer of proceedings under Section 25 CPC is justified when facts and circumstances warrant it for convenience and expeditious disposal

Judgment Excerpts

This transfer petition has been filed under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Considering the facts and circumstances and the material on the record, this Court is of the opinion that prayer for transfer of proceedings...is justified

Procedural History

Divorce Petition No. 10/2017 filed by husband in Rajasthan court. Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 113 of 2018 filed by wife in Supreme Court seeking transfer to Uttar Pradesh.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 25
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Transfer Petition in Divorce Case Under Section 25 CPC. Wife's Request for Transfer of Proceedings from Rajasthan to Uttar Pradesh Granted Based on Facts and Circumstances.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Grants Leave in Temple Administration Dispute and Orders Interim Arrangement Pending Final Hearing. The Court noted that the factual determination of whether the temple belongs to the Mutt requires deeper consideration and balanced equi...