Supreme Court Directs State to Issue Fresh Tender for Transportation Contract Due to Lethargy and Financial Loss. The Court held that continuing contracts on interim arrangements without fresh tenders causes huge loss to the public exchequer and violates principles of fair procurement, mandating a transparent e-Tender process within strict timelines.

  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from the State of Manipur's failure to issue fresh tenders for transportation contracts under the Wheat Based Nutrition Programme (WBNP) and Supplementary Nutrition Programme (SNP), leading to continued interim arrangements since 2017-18. The appellant, M/s B.K. Enterprises, challenged the High Court's order that directed fresh tender issuance but allowed interim arrangements to continue. The core legal issue was whether such indefinite continuation without fresh tenders, causing financial loss, was permissible. The appellant argued it was the lowest bidder and should be awarded contracts, while the State cited administrative difficulties and sought time. The Supreme Court analyzed the facts, noting the State's lethargy had caused huge loss to the public exchequer by maintaining old rates. It emphasized that contracts cannot be prolonged on interim bases without fresh tenders. The Court directed the State to issue a fresh NIT within 10 days, conduct a fair, transparent, nationwide e-Tender process within six weeks, and continue interim arrangements only until December 31, 2021, to avoid beneficiary inconvenience. It mandated a compliance report and warned of serious consequences for non-compliance, thereby disposing of the appeal with specific directives to ensure timely and transparent procurement.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Public Procurement - Duty to Prevent Loss to Public Exchequer - Not mentioned - The Supreme Court deprecated the State Government's lethargy in not inviting fresh tenders for transportation contracts under nutrition programmes, which caused huge financial loss to the state and public exchequer by continuing interim arrangements at outdated rates. Held that contracts cannot be continued indefinitely without finalizing tender processes or issuing fresh tenders, and such inaction is unacceptable. (Paras 2.1, 4, 5)

B) Contract Law - Tender Process - Mandatory Fresh Invitation - Not mentioned - The Court found that the State of Manipur had failed to issue fresh Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) since 2017-18, continuing contracts solely on interim arrangements, which was improper. Directed the State to issue fresh NIT within 10 days and complete the entire tender process within six weeks through fair and transparent e-Tender, with nationwide invitation to prevent cartelization and ensure maximum price realization. (Paras 3, 4, 6)

C) Constitutional Law - Judicial Directions - Compliance and Monitoring - Not mentioned - To address administrative delays and ensure beneficiary convenience, the Supreme Court modified the High Court's directions by extending the interim arrangement for transportation under SNP till 31.12.2021 and mandated the State to submit a compliance report. Warned that any lapse or non-compliance would be viewed seriously. (Paras 6, 7)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the continuation of a transportation contract under the Wheat Based Nutrition Programme (WBNP) and Supplementary Nutrition Programme (SNP) on an interim arrangement basis without fresh tenders, causing financial loss to the state, is permissible and what directions are warranted

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court disposed of the appeal by directing the State to issue fresh NIT within 10 days, conduct fair and transparent e-Tender nationwide within six weeks, continue interim arrangements till 31.12.2021, and submit a compliance report, with warning for non-compliance.

Law Points

  • Public procurement must be fair
  • transparent
  • and timely
  • contracts cannot be continued indefinitely on interim arrangements without fresh tenders
  • state authorities have a duty to prevent loss to the public exchequer
  • courts can issue specific directions to ensure compliance and transparency in tender processes
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (SC) (11) 19

Civil Appeal No. 6532 of 2021

2021-11-12

M.R. Shah, A.S. Bopanna

Shri Siddhartha Dave, Shri Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar

M/s B.K. Enterprises

The State of Manipur and Another

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal challenging the High Court's order regarding tender process for transportation contracts under nutrition programmes

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought award of tender as lowest bidder and challenged continuation of interim arrangements; State sought time to complete tender process

Filing Reason

Appellant aggrieved by High Court's disposal of writ appeal with directions for fresh tender but continuation of interim arrangements

Previous Decisions

High Court disposed of writ appeal with directions to issue fresh NIT within 10 days and complete tender process within 20 days, continuing interim arrangements; earlier, High Court directed constitution of High Power Committee for fresh tender process

Issues

Whether continuation of transportation contracts on interim arrangement basis without fresh tenders is permissible What directions are warranted to ensure fair and transparent tender process and prevent financial loss

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued it was lowest bidder and should be awarded contracts State cited administrative difficulties and sought time to complete tender process, offering unconditional apology

Ratio Decidendi

Contracts cannot be continued indefinitely without fresh tenders or finalizing tender processes, especially when causing financial loss to the state and public exchequer; courts must issue specific directions to ensure timely, transparent procurement and prevent lethargy.

Judgment Excerpts

This is a glaring example of lethargy on the part of the State Government in not inviting the fresh tenders Contracts cannot be continued without finalizing of the tender process and/or without issuing fresh tenders The action on the part of the State Government and the Social Welfare Department of the State of Manipur is highly deprecated

Procedural History

State issued NIT on 22.06.2017; Higher Tender Committee recommended rates on 16.12.2017; appellant filed writ petition in 2018; High Court disposed of writ petition with directions for fresh tender process on 20.06.2018; appellant filed writ appeal; High Court disposed of appeal with directions on 04.11.2020; Supreme Court heard appeal and passed judgment on 12.11.2021

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Directs State to Issue Fresh Tender for Transportation Contract Due to Lethargy and Financial Loss. The Court held that continuing contracts on interim arrangements without fresh tenders causes huge loss to the public exchequer and viol...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Quashes Amendment to Plaint After Trial Commencement for Lack of Due Diligence. Amendment sought after trial starts dismissed; plaintiff failed to show due diligence under Order 6, Rule 17, CPC.