Supreme Court Allows Transfer Petition in Divorce Case for Wife's Convenience. Transfer granted under Section 25 CPC as petitioner resided 237 km away in Gujarat, making travel difficult, and respondent did not appear despite service.

  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court of India heard a transfer petition filed by the petitioner-wife under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The petitioner sought to transfer Divorce Case No. 94 of 2018, filed by the respondent-husband under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, from the Court of Additional District Judge, No. 1, Aburoad, Sirohi, Rajasthan, to the Court of the Additional Civil Judge & JMFC, Gandhinagar, Gujarat. The petitioner argued that she resided in Gandhinagar, Gujarat, approximately 237 km from Sirohi, Rajasthan, making it difficult for her to travel to defend the case. Notice was issued to the respondent on October 18, 2019, and served on November 19, 2019, but the respondent did not appear or provide representation. The court considered the facts pleaded in the petition and heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The court analyzed the issue based on the convenience of the parties and the just and appropriate grounds for transfer under Section 25 CPC. The court reasoned that the petitioner's residence in Gujarat and the significant distance involved justified the transfer to ensure her ability to participate in the proceedings effectively. The court held that it was just and appropriate to transfer the case, allowing the petition and ordering the transfer accordingly.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Transfer of Cases - Convenience of Parties - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Section 25 - Petitioner-wife sought transfer of divorce case from Rajasthan to Gujarat citing distance of 237 km and difficulty in traveling - Court found it just and appropriate to transfer the case as petitioner resided in Gujarat and respondent did not appear despite service - Held that transfer was warranted for petitioner's convenience (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the divorce case pending in Rajasthan should be transferred to Gujarat for the convenience of the petitioner-wife

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. Divorce Case No. 94 of 2018 titled 'Shri Kailash Chand Agrawal Vs. Smt. Mamta' pending in the Court of Additional District Judge, No. 1, Aburoad, Sirohi, Rajasthan is transferred to the Court of the Additional Civil Judge & JMFC, Gandhinagar, Gujarat.

Law Points

  • Transfer of cases under Section 25 CPC
  • convenience of parties
  • just and appropriate grounds for transfer
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (SC) (11) 91

Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 2460 of 2019

2021-11-22

B.V. Nagarathna

Mamta

Kailash Chand Agrawal

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Transfer petition under Section 25 CPC seeking transfer of divorce case

Remedy Sought

Petitioner-wife seeks transfer of Divorce Case No. 94 of 2018 from Rajasthan to Gujarat

Filing Reason

Petitioner resides in Gujarat, 237 km from Rajasthan court, making travel difficult for defense

Previous Decisions

Notice issued to respondent on 2019-10-18, served on 2019-11-19, no representation from respondent

Issues

Whether the divorce case should be transferred from Rajasthan to Gujarat for the petitioner's convenience

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued difficulty in traveling 237 km from Gujarat to Rajasthan to defend the case Respondent did not appear or provide representation despite service of notice

Ratio Decidendi

Transfer of cases under Section 25 CPC can be granted when it is just and appropriate, considering the convenience of parties, such as when a petitioner resides far from the court and faces difficulty in travel.

Judgment Excerpts

it is just and appropriate to transfer the Divorce Case No. 94 of 2018 the petitioner is residing in Gandhinagar Gujarat which is a distance of about 237 Km

Procedural History

Petition filed under Section 25 CPC. Notice issued to respondent on 2019-10-18, served on 2019-11-19. No representation from respondent. Hearing held for petitioner. Order passed on 2021-11-22.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 25
  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: Section 13
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Transfer Petition in Divorce Case for Wife's Convenience. Transfer granted under Section 25 CPC as petitioner resided 237 km away in Gujarat, making travel difficult, and respondent did not appear despite service.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Enhanced Compensation to Rs. 37,80,681/- in Motor Accident Claim Case. Major Married and Earning Children Also Entitled to Compensation as Legal Representatives – Supreme Court Reiterated.