Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Excise Duty Exemption Case — NCCD, Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess Not Payable When Basic Excise Duty Exempted. Exemption Notification Under Section 5A of Central Excise Act, 1944 Covers NCCD as Duty of Excise, and Surcharges on Excise Duty Cannot Be Levied Without Substratum.

  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal arose from a dispute between Bajaj Auto Limited (appellant) and the Union of India (respondent) regarding the liability to pay National Calamity Contingent Duty (NCCD), Education Cess, and Secondary & Higher Education Cess. The appellant established a manufacturing unit in Uttarakhand in 2007 and was exempted from Central Excise Duty under Notification No.50/2003-Central Excise issued under Section 5A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as part of a policy to promote industrial development in Uttarakhand and Himachal Pradesh. An audit in February 2009 revealed that the appellant had not paid the three cesses, leading to a show cause notice in August 2011 demanding payment. The appellant challenged the notice by filing a writ petition in the Uttarakhand High Court, which was dismissed by both the Single Judge and the Division Bench. The Supreme Court granted leave and heard the appeal. The legal issues were whether the exemption from basic excise duty also exempted NCCD, Education Cess, and Secondary & Higher Education Cess. The appellant argued that NCCD is a duty of excise and thus covered by the exemption, and that Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess are surcharges on excise duty and cannot be levied when the basic duty is exempted. The Department contended that the exemption notification must be strictly construed and did not specifically mention these cesses. The Supreme Court analyzed the relevant provisions: Section 136 of the Finance Act, 2001 imposes NCCD as a duty of excise in addition to other duties; Sections 91-93 of the Finance Act, 2004 impose Education Cess as a surcharge on excise duty; and Sections 136-138 of the Finance Act, 2007 impose Secondary & Higher Education Cess similarly. The Court relied on its earlier decision in SRD Nutrients Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Guwahati (2018) 1 SCC 105, which held that Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess, being surcharges on excise duty, are not leviable when the basic excise duty is exempted. The Court also noted that the Department's own circular dated 10.8.2004 clarified that no education cess is leviable on goods fully exempted from excise duty. Regarding NCCD, the Court held that since NCCD is a duty of excise leviable under the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the exemption notification exempts goods from the whole of the duty of excise, NCCD is also covered by the exemption. The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's orders, and quashed the show cause notice.

Headnote

A) Central Excise - Exemption Notification - National Calamity Contingent Duty (NCCD) - Section 136 Finance Act, 2001 - NCCD is a duty of excise leviable under the Central Excise Act, 1944 - Exemption notification under Section 5A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 exempts goods from 'whole of the duty of excise' which includes NCCD - Held that NCCD being a duty of excise, the exemption notification covers it and appellant is not liable to pay NCCD (Paras 15-17).

B) Central Excise - Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess - Surcharge on Excise Duty - Sections 91-93 Finance Act, 2004 and Sections 136-138 Finance Act, 2007 - These cesses are surcharges calculated on the aggregate of excise duties - When basic excise duty is exempted, there is no substratum for levy of these cesses - Held that Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess are not payable when the basic excise duty is exempted, following SRD Nutrients Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Guwahati (2018) 1 SCC 105 (Paras 12-14).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a manufacturing establishment exempted from payment of Central Excise Duty under the Central Excise Act, 1944 is also liable to pay National Calamity Contingent Duty (NCCD), Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the orders of the High Court, and quashed the show cause notice dated 26.8.2011. The appellant is not liable to pay NCCD, Education Cess, and Secondary & Higher Education Cess.

Law Points

  • Exemption from basic excise duty extends to cesses levied as surcharge on excise duty
  • NCCD is a duty of excise and exemption notification covers it
  • Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess are surcharges on excise duty and cannot be levied when basic duty is exempted
  • Strict construction of exemption notification not applicable when plain language covers the cesses
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (SC) (3) 50

Civil Appeal No.3239 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP(C) No.21968 of 2017)

2019-03-01

Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Bajaj Auto Limited

Union of India & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal against High Court order dismissing writ petition challenging show cause notice demanding payment of NCCD, Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought quashing of show cause notice and declaration that it is not liable to pay the three cesses.

Filing Reason

Appellant was exempted from Central Excise Duty under Notification No.50/2003-Central Excise but was issued show cause notice demanding NCCD, Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess.

Previous Decisions

Single Judge of Uttarakhand High Court dismissed writ petition on 9.10.2014; Division Bench dismissed appeal on 16.3.2017.

Issues

Whether NCCD, being a duty of excise, is covered by the exemption notification under Section 5A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Whether Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess, being surcharges on excise duty, are leviable when the basic excise duty is exempted.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that NCCD is a duty of excise and thus covered by the exemption; Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess are surcharges on excise duty and cannot be levied when basic duty is exempted. Department argued that exemption notification must be strictly construed and does not specifically mention these cesses; there was wilful suppression of facts.

Ratio Decidendi

NCCD is a duty of excise leviable under the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the exemption notification under Section 5A exempts goods from the whole of the duty of excise, thus covering NCCD. Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess are surcharges on excise duty; when the basic excise duty is exempted, there is no substratum for their levy, and they are not payable.

Judgment Excerpts

The appeal raises the legal question of the liability towards National Calamity Contingent Duty (for short ‘NCCD’), Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess of a manufacturing establishment, which is exempted from payment of Central Excise Duty (for short ‘CENVAT’) under the Central Excise Act, 1944. Since these cesses are a surcharge levied and collected on the total value of the excise duty, and the excise duty itself is exempted, there cannot be any question of any recovery of these cesses, as the substratum does not exist. NCCD is a duty of excise leviable under the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the exemption notification exempts goods from the whole of the duty of excise, thus covering NCCD.

Procedural History

Appellant established manufacturing unit in 2007 and was exempted from CENVAT. Audit on 27/28.2.2009 raised objection about non-payment of three cesses. Show cause notice issued on 26.8.2011. Appellant filed writ petition in Uttarakhand High Court on 13.10.2011, which was dismissed by Single Judge on 9.10.2014. Appeal to Division Bench dismissed on 16.3.2017. Supreme Court granted leave on 1.3.2019 and allowed the appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Central Excise Act, 1944: Section 5A
  • Finance Act, 2001: Section 136
  • Finance Act, 2004: Sections 91, 93
  • Finance Act, 2007: Sections 136, 138
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Excise Duty Exemption Case — NCCD, Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess Not Payable When Basic Excise Duty Exempted. Exemption Notification Under Section 5A of Central Excise Act, 1944 Covers NCCD as D...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence and Non-Examination of Investigating Officer. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt be...