Supreme Court Upholds Death Penalty in Multiple Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. The court affirmed the conviction and death sentence for murdering five persons and attempting to murder one, driven by greed to steal money.

  • 8
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Khushwinder Singh, was convicted by the Sessions Court for the murder of five persons and attempt to murder one, under Sections 302, 307, 201, and 380 IPC. The prosecution case was that the appellant, motivated by greed to steal Rs.37,00,000/- from the complainant's family, deceitfully lured the victims to a canal under the pretext of performing a religious ritual ('Dhala') and pushed them into the canal. The sole survivor, Jasmeen Kaur (PW-5), narrated the incident. The appellant also administered sleeping pills to three victims earlier. The dead bodies were recovered, and stolen money was found at his instance. The High Court confirmed the conviction and death sentence. The Supreme Court, in appeal, examined the circumstantial evidence, including the testimony of PW-5, recovery of money and dead bodies, and the appellant's conduct. The court held that the chain of circumstances was complete and pointed only to the guilt of the appellant. The court also upheld the death sentence, categorizing the case as 'rarest of rare' due to the brutal, premeditated murders of innocent persons, including children, and the appellant's lack of remorse. The appeals were dismissed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Circumstantial Evidence - Multiple Murders - Motive of Greed - The appellant was convicted for murdering five persons and attempting to murder one, driven by greed to misappropriate Rs.37,00,000/-. The court held that the chain of circumstantial evidence was complete and consistent with the guilt of the accused, rejecting the defence of false implication. (Paras 1-10)

B) Criminal Law - Death Penalty - Rarest of Rare Cases - The court affirmed the death sentence, noting the brutal and diabolical nature of the murders, the helplessness of the victims (including children), and the lack of any mitigating circumstances. The case fell within the 'rarest of rare' category. (Paras 11-15)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction and death sentence imposed on the appellant for multiple murders under Section 302 IPC and other offences are sustainable on the basis of circumstantial evidence.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, upholding the conviction and death sentence imposed by the Sessions Court and affirmed by the High Court.

Law Points

  • Circumstantial evidence
  • motive
  • death penalty
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 201 IPC
  • Section 380 IPC
  • Section 307 IPC
  • Section 164 CrPC
  • Section 173 CrPC
  • Section 207 CrPC
  • Section 264 IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (SC) (3) 55

Criminal Appeal Nos. 1433-1434 of 2014

2019-03-05

M. R. Shah

Khushwinder Singh

State of Punjab

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction and death sentence for multiple murders and other offences.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal or commutation of death sentence.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted and sentenced to death by the Sessions Court, affirmed by the High Court.

Previous Decisions

Sessions Court convicted and sentenced to death; High Court affirmed.

Issues

Whether the conviction based on circumstantial evidence is sustainable. Whether the death sentence is appropriate in this case.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the evidence was insufficient and that he was falsely implicated. Prosecution argued that the chain of circumstantial evidence was complete and proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the circumstantial evidence, including the testimony of the sole survivor, recovery of stolen money and dead bodies, and the appellant's conduct, formed a complete chain pointing to the guilt of the accused. The case fell within the 'rarest of rare' category warranting the death penalty due to the brutal and premeditated nature of the murders.

Judgment Excerpts

The court held that the chain of circumstantial evidence was complete and consistent with the guilt of the accused. The case fell within the 'rarest of rare' category warranting the death penalty.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Sessions Court, Fatehgarh Sahib on 15.03.2013 for offences under Sections 302, 307, 201, and 380 IPC and sentenced to death. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana affirmed the conviction and death sentence on 20.09.2013. The appellant then appealed to the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 302, 307, 201, 380, 264
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 164, 173, 207
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Death Penalty in Multiple Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. The court affirmed the conviction and death sentence for murdering five persons and attempting to murder one, driven by greed to steal money.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence for Accused in Rape and Murder of Five-Year-Old Child. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen and Recovery at Instance of Accused Proved Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.