Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Dispute on Gas Connection Charges. Measuring Equipment Installed for Supplier's Billing Purposes Not Taxable Under 'Supply of Tangible Goods Service' as Customer Does Not Use the Equipment.

  • 8
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal which set aside a demand for service tax on gas connection charges collected by M/s Adani Gas Ltd. The respondent is engaged in distributing natural gas to industrial, commercial and domestic consumers. To facilitate distribution, it installs SKID equipment (isolation valves, filters, regulators, electronic meters) at customers' sites to regulate supply and record consumption for billing. The respondent retains ownership and possession of the equipment; customers have no control or legal rights. The Gas Sales Agreement provides that the respondent has the right to adjust, maintain, and remove the equipment. The revenue issued a show cause notice alleging that these transactions fall under 'supply of tangible goods service' under Section 65(105)(zzzzj) of the Finance Act, 1994, introduced with effect from 16 May 2008. The Adjudicating Authority confirmed the demand, holding that the customer uses the equipment indirectly for verifying billing accuracy. The Tribunal reversed this, finding that the equipment is used by the respondent for its own billing purposes, not by the customer. The Supreme Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, reasoning that the essential element of Section 65(105)(zzzzj) is that the goods must be for the 'use' of the customer. Since the SKID equipment is installed and used by the respondent for metering and billing, it is not for the customer's use. The fact that the customer benefits from accurate billing does not constitute 'use' of the equipment. The Court also noted that the charges are partly refundable and are in the nature of a security deposit. Accordingly, the appeal was dismissed, and the service tax demand was set aside.

Headnote

A) Service Tax - Supply of Tangible Goods Service - Section 65(105)(zzzzj) of Finance Act, 1994 - Interpretation - The key ingredient for taxability under this provision is that the goods must be for the 'use' of the customer - The measuring equipment (SKID) installed at customer's site is used by the supplier for metering and billing purposes, not by the customer - Hence, not taxable under this category (Paras 1-9).

B) Service Tax - Gas Connection Charges - Nature of Transaction - The charges collected for supply of pipes and measuring equipment are not for transfer of right to use but are in the nature of security deposit or cost of installation for the supplier's own use - The customer does not have control or legal rights over the equipment - Therefore, no service tax liability under Section 65(105)(zzzzj) (Paras 2-8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the gas connection charges collected by the respondent for supply of pipes and measuring equipment to customers are taxable under Section 65(105)(zzzzj) of the Finance Act, 1994 as 'supply of tangible goods service'.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal's order that the gas connection charges are not taxable under Section 65(105)(zzzzj) of the Finance Act, 1994. The demand for service tax, interest, and penalties was set aside.

Law Points

  • Interpretation of Section 65(105)(zzzzj) of Finance Act
  • 1994
  • Supply of tangible goods service
  • Use of equipment by customer
  • Ownership and possession
  • Gas connection charges
  • Measuring equipment for billing
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (SC) (8) 7

Civil Appeal No. 2633 of 2020

2020-08-28

Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud

Commissioner of Service Tax, Ahmedabad

M/s Adani Gas Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal against Tribunal order setting aside service tax demand on gas connection charges.

Remedy Sought

Revenue sought to restore the demand for service tax on charges collected for supply of pipes and measuring equipment.

Filing Reason

Revenue challenged the Tribunal's decision that the charges were not taxable under Section 65(105)(zzzzj) of Finance Act, 1994.

Previous Decisions

Adjudicating Authority confirmed demand; Tribunal reversed and set aside demand.

Issues

Whether the gas connection charges for supply of pipes and measuring equipment are taxable under Section 65(105)(zzzzj) of Finance Act, 1994 as 'supply of tangible goods service'.

Submissions/Arguments

Revenue argued that the measuring equipment is for the use of the customer as they benefit from accurate billing, and the charges are not fully refundable. Respondent argued that the equipment is used by them for metering and billing, not by the customer, and the charges are refundable security deposits.

Ratio Decidendi

For a transaction to be taxable under Section 65(105)(zzzzj) of the Finance Act, 1994 as 'supply of tangible goods service', the goods must be for the 'use' of the customer. Where the equipment is installed and used by the supplier for its own purposes (such as metering and billing), and the customer has no control or right to use the equipment, the service is not covered under this provision.

Judgment Excerpts

The Tribunal held that the purpose of the equipment is to measure the amount of gas supplied to the customer for the purpose of billing. They are, therefore, for the use of the appellant and are not for use by the customers. The expression 'use' does not mean that the recipient has to personally and physically use the equipment all the time. It broadly refers to the direct or indirect use whether personally or through anybody else and meant to serve the intended purpose of the goods.

Procedural History

Show cause notice issued on 13 October 2009; Adjudicating Authority confirmed demand on 30 March 2011; Tribunal allowed appeal on 5 April 2019; Revenue appealed to Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Finance Act, 1994: 65(105)(zzzzj), 65(105)(zzz), 76, 77, 78
  • Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985: Chapter Sub-Heading 27112900
  • Constitution of India: Article 366(29-A)(d)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Dispute on Gas Connection Charges. Measuring Equipment Installed for Supplier's Billing Purposes Not Taxable Under 'Supply of Tangible Goods Service' as Customer Does Not Use the Equipment.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Disability Accommodation Case Under RPwD Act 2016 - Appellant with Dysgraphia Denied Compensatory Time in NEET Exam Granted Relief. Court Upholds Statutory Rights to Reasonable Accommodation and Inclusive Education Unde...